[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipse-pmc] contributed keyword
|
In my understanding there is no partial committer.
You either have commit rights to *any* of the components located in the
Eclipse toplevel project (aka Eclipse SDK) or you don't.
Eugene Kuleshov
<eu@xxxxxxxx>
Sent by: To
eclipse-pmc-bounc eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
es@xxxxxxxxxxx cc
Subject
07/06/2007 16:50 Re: [eclipse-pmc] contributed
keyword
Please respond to
eclipse-pmc@eclip
se.org
How about partial committers? If committer only have partial commit
rights on some project modules. Does his patches to other modules gets
"contributed" keyword?
regards,
Eugene
Jerome Lanneluc wrote:
> Now that we know what a non-committer is, can we define what a
contribution
> is ?
>
> Does it include:
>
> 1. a change to a SDK project ?
> Obviously yes :-)
>
> 2. a change to a doc project ?
> In the last arch call, we said yes as well
>
> 3. a change to a test project ?
> I would say yes, but what do you think ?
>
> 4. a change to a web project ?
> I'm not sure about this one, What do you think ?
>
> 5. a change to a non-SDK project (e.g. the releng projects are not
included
> in the SDK) ?
> I would say yes, but what do you think ?
>
> Or should we say that any change committed to the CVS repository related
> the Eclipse Project is a contribution ?
>
> Jerome
>
>
>
>
> Daniel Megert
> <daniel_megert@ch
> .ibm.com>
To
> Sent by: eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> eclipse-pmc-bounc
cc
> es@xxxxxxxxxxx eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
> eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
> 06/07/2007 10:47 Re: [eclipse-pmc] contributed
> AM keyword
>
>
> Please respond to
> eclipse-pmc@eclip
> se.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Good, this means that inactive commiters don't get the 'contributed'
> keyword as they are still single person commiters on that project.
>
> Dani
>
>
>
> Philippe P Mulet
> <philippe_mulet@f
> r.ibm.com>
To
> Sent by: eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> eclipse-pmc-bounc
cc
> es@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
> Re: [eclipse-pmc] contributed
> 07.06.2007 10:45 keyword
>
>
> Please respond to
> eclipse-pmc@eclip
> se.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Who they work for is irrelevant. The important question is:
> "Were they committers to the Eclipse SDK project when they contributed
the
> patch ?"
> If answer is no, then use the "contributed" keyword.
>
>
>
>
> Daniel Megert
> <daniel_megert@ch
> .ibm.com>
To
> Sent by: eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> eclipse-pmc-bounc
cc
> es@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
> [eclipse-pmc] contributed keyword
> 07/06/2007 09:27
>
>
> Please respond to
> eclipse-pmc@eclip
> se.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Just wanted to get clarification about committers that no longer actively
> work on the Eclipse Project. I heard different opinions about that issue
> during the call e.g. non-active committers should also get the
> 'contributed' keyword. However, such committers that no longer work for
us,
> signed the single person committer agreement and they are still
registered
> as committers and as far as I know they also have the corresponding
> permission on the server and bugzilla.
>
> Can you please clarify. Thanks
>
>
> Dani
>
_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc
