The following week would work better for me. I'm done with travel for awhile now and just need to get through my backlog. :}
Thanks,
Dave
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Kevin McGuire
<Kevin_McGuire@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Just to clarify, we'd just be looking
at CSS technology.
Recognizing that August is vacation
month for many, if you want to have this later in Sept. let me know.
Regards
Kevin
----- Forwarded by Kevin
McGuire/Ottawa/IBM on 07/30/2008 01:43 PM -----
| Kevin McGuire/Ottawa/IBM
07/29/2008 02:38 PM
|
|
Hi everyone,
Some people had expressed to me time conflicts with this original proposal.
We now have some entries in the wiki (thanks all) and I'd like to
schedule a call for us to review where we're at. How would late next
week (say Thurs. Aug 7) or early the following work for people?
Cheers,
Kevin
----- Forwarded by Kevin
McGuire/Ottawa/IBM on 07/29/2008 02:35 PM -----
| Kevin McGuire/Ottawa/IBM
06/23/2008 02:54 PM
|
|
To
| "E4 developer list"
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| CSS and declarative UI round up |
|
Hi folks,
Over the course of discussions, many
folks have come forth with a favorite CSS/ declarative-UI implementation.
So much to choose from! So much to know! As a first step,
I thought it'd be helpful for us to have a roundup of them all so we can
discuss their pros and cons. Eventually we'd all like to see some
working CSS code in e4 eclipse.org repo and at the moment it seems the
main problem is we have too many to choose from (a great problem to have!).
What I had in mind was:
- Those who have some technology they'd
like to bring forth prepare a small presentation of its pros and cons.
- We have a call where they are presented.
We can as a group then better understand our requirements and which
technologies fit those.
- Ideally we would have three presentations
of 1/2 hour each (including discussion), plus wrap up discussion, so two
hours max for the call. I'd prefer a shorter call but I don't think
that's realistic. If we have more than three presentations then we
can split it into two calls, since I don't know about you but my attention
span nears zero after 2 hours.
- Our goals should be selecting the technology
which will be the initial commit for the purpose of investigation. We
may change our minds later, but we need to start with something. If
there are two (or more) favorite technologies we can commit both, like
we have the EMF/non-EMF modelling work.
What do folks think?
If we like this approach, I'd suggest
we aim for a call in approximately two weeks, to folks time to prep.
Kevin
_______________________________________________
eclipse-incubator-e4-dev mailing list
eclipse-incubator-e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-incubator-e4-dev
