The simplest
proposal I can think of is to add equinox doc contributors to the eclipse.platform.runtime
group.
I'm not particularly in favour of granting rights to code like that. Of course, Ian et al are trustworthy etc but it is not a great message. I'd rather see one of the existing (or new) equinox group get access granted to the doc needed. then when we migrate we can just change the ACLs such that that group no longer gets platform doc access for free.
That captures the intent and facilitates the current situation Jeff
John,
I see a small problem with docs. There are a few of us who are committers
on Equinox (p2 in particular), but not the 'Eclipse' project itself.
However, the p2 docs are in the platform.isv bundle, and with the new ACL,
I think we will loose access to the doc bundles.
cheers,
ian
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:02 PM, John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Eclipse Project Committers: PLEASE READ! Your commit rights may be affected
if you do not act on this message.
For historical reasons, the Eclipse project has a complex set of Unix permission
groups controlling access to its source code. Many of these groups do not
correspond to active component areas, making committer elections and access
management unnecessarily complex for both Eclipse project committers and
Foundation staff. We are seeking to rectify this situation by creating
a normalized Unix group structure that maps directly to each of our projects
and sub-projects. At the same time, we are taking the opportunity to clear
out committers who have been inactive for extended periods. Essentially,
we are only planning to add active committers into the newly created Unix
groups that will control write access to our source repository.
If you are currently a committer on the Eclipse project (Platform,JDT,PDE,e4),
please review the listing at [1] of proposed associations between committer
IDs and groups. The mapping from Unix groups to projects in our repository
can be found at [2]. No committer who is active or interested in remaining
active should lose commit access to any source code they currently have
write access to. If you believe this has occurred, please reply to this
note on the eclipse-dev mailing list so it can be corrected. Note that
some committers may gain write access to source code they previously didn't
have access to as part of this change. Those committers are expected to
maintain their usual discretion and avoid modifying code without first
discussing with active committers in that area.
Apologies if you receive this note multiple times. Changing or removing
commit rights is a process we do not take likely, and we are using every
possible channel to make sure committers are made aware of the change.
Component leads are encouraged to forward this note to their component
mailing lists to ensure all committers are reached.
[1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse/PMC/Unix_Groups/New_ACLS_By_Committer
[2] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse/PMC/Unix_Groups/New_ACLS_By_Project
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com
| http://twitter.com/eclipsesource_______________________________________________
eclipse-dev mailing list
eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-dev
_______________________________________________ eclipse-dev mailing list eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-dev
|