Re: [eclipse-dev] Planning Meeting Notes - Feb 22, 2006

[John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Michael wrote on 22/02/2006 08:59:24 PM:

> > Workspace:
> > - There has been some good discussion on eclipse-dev about how
to treat
> >   provisional APIs.  We should ensure we have a consistent
story for
> >   provisional APIs across all teams for the 3.2 release.
 How should
> >   they be named? Should we use x-internal? Should javadoc
be generated?
> >   How should we publicize them to ensure we get feedback?
> 
> I think it would be great if the conclusion/advice could be summarized
> in a document, wither on eclipse.or or on the wiki.

Michael, I'm working on that right now.  I will
post it here soon, and it will be on wiki.eclipse.org.

John