[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[eclipse-dev] Re: [eclipse-build] I20021204 (Claude Knaus)
|
http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27727
has been resolved as fixed.
|
| eclipse-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent by: eclipse-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
12/05/2002 11:05 AM
Please respond to eclipse-dev
|
To: eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc:
Subject: eclipse-dev digest, Vol 1 #341 - 15 msgs |
Send eclipse-dev mailing list submissions to
eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
eclipse-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
eclipse-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of eclipse-dev digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. [eclipse-build] I20021204 (Timestamp: 200212041234): Build has started (sonia_dimitrov@xxxxxxx)
2. Re: [eclipse-build] I20021204 (Timestamp: 200212041234): Build
has started (celek@xxxxxxxxxx)
3. Compiler innerclass emulation change (Philippe P Mulet)
4. [eclipse-build] Build I20021204 (Timestamp: 200212041234):Build is complete. Automated JUnit testing is starting. (sonia_dimitrov@xxxxxxx)
5. [eclipse-build] Build I20021204 (Timestamp: 200212041234):Automated JUnit Testing complete. All tests pass (sonia_dimitrov@xxxxxxx)
6. I20021204 does not start on Win NT 4 (Knut Radloff)
7. Bug in launching run-time workbench (dejan@xxxxxxxxxx)
8. [eclipse-build] Build N20021205 (Timestamp: 200212050010):Compile errors in build (sonia_dimitrov@xxxxxxx)
9. Re: [eclipse-build] I20021204 (Claude Knaus)
10. Re: [eclipse-build] I20021204 (Martin Aeschlimann)
11. Re: [eclipse-build] I20021204 (Tod Creasey)
12. Re: [eclipse-build] Build N20021205 (Timestamp: 200212050010):Compile
errors in build (dejan@xxxxxxxxxx)
13. Re: I20021204 does not start on Win NT 4 (Christophe Cornu)
----- Message from sonia_dimitrov@xxxxxxx on Wed, 4 Dec 2002 12:31:53 -0500 -----
| To:
| eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Subject:
| [eclipse-dev] [eclipse-build] I20021204 (Timestamp: 200212041234): Build has started |
Build I20021204 (Timestamp: 200212041234) is underway.
----- Message from celek@xxxxxxxxxx on Wed, 4 Dec 2002 12:50:54 -0500 -----
| To:
| eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Subject:
| Re: [eclipse-dev] [eclipse-build] I20021204 (Timestamp: 200212041234): Build has started |
I dropped a new Update.Core that reverts some classes to 1126 code
stream
bug 27618 will be fixed as reverting to 1126 removes the change introduced
in 1203
bug 27581 will not be fixed as it results of a faulty feature directory
where 2
features are missing (1126 and 1127 builds are missing 2 features). The
workaround will
be to either install in a different directory or remove .config from
current
workspace. This bug should only affect people who were using 1126 or 1127
and who are replacing the 1126/1127 build by 1204
I released the new code (well old code), released map, manually exported
updatecore.jar from my workspace and verified the updatecore.jar fixes
27618 if dropped in
1203 build
It's a go for a build from my side
Christophe Elek
Eclipse Project: <http://eclipse.org>
IBM canada
Christophe Elek
Eclipse Project: <http://eclipse.org>
IBM canada
Wednesday, December 04, 2002 12:39 PM
To: eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc:
From: sonia_dimitrov@xxxxxxx
Subject: [eclipse-dev] [eclipse-build] I20021204 (Timestamp: 200212041234):
Build has started
Build I20021204 (Timestamp: 200212041234) is underway.
_______________________________________________
eclipse-dev mailing list
eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-dev
----- Message from "Philippe P Mulet" <MULETPP@xxxxxxxxxx> on Wed, 4 Dec 2002 18:54:03 +0100 -----
| To:
| eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Subject:
| [eclipse-dev] Compiler innerclass emulation change |
If you do care about serializing instances of local innerclasses, then you
should read this note below.
We recently ran the JACKS test suite over our compiler, and found this
interesting issue:
=============
JACKS: VerifyError when affecting final local in anonymous class header (
http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26122)
=============
Basically, we were generated invalid code for the following source, which
would result into a verify error at runtime:
final int i;
new A(i = 1) {
{ System.out.print(i); }
};
since we were emulating this into:
final int i;
new A(i, i = 1) { // A(int val$i, int someInt) - synthetic argument
added before
{ System.out.print(val$i); }
};
instead of:
final int i;
new A(i = 1, i) { //A (int someInt, int val$i) - synthetic argument
added after
{ System.out.print(val$i); }
};
Therefore, we had to swap the order of arguments passed to the constructor,
so that captured outer local variables reflect possible side-effects which
occurred during argument _expression_ evaluation.
This means all constructor signatures for local types may have changed
since we released this bug fix (from integration build 20021126 on).
----- Message from sonia_dimitrov@xxxxxxx on Wed, 4 Dec 2002 13:23:38 -0500 -----
| To:
| eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Subject:
| [eclipse-dev] [eclipse-build] Build I20021204 (Timestamp: 200212041234):Build is complete. Automated JUnit testing is starting. |
Build I20021204 (Timestamp: 200212041234): The Build is complete. Automated JUnit testing is starting.
----- Message from sonia_dimitrov@xxxxxxx on Wed, 4 Dec 2002 14:47:42 -0500 -----
| To:
| eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Subject:
| [eclipse-dev] [eclipse-build] Build I20021204 (Timestamp: 200212041234):Automated JUnit Testing complete. All tests pass |
Build I20021204 (Timestamp: 200212041234): Automated JUnit testing is complete. All tests pass
----- Message from "Knut Radloff" <knut_radloff@xxxxxxx> on Wed, 4 Dec 2002 17:39:05 -0500 -----
| To:
| eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Subject:
| [eclipse-dev] I20021204 does not start on Win NT 4 |
Is anyone running the 20021204 integration build on Windows NT?
I get an error message from the VM about a missing entry point in GDI32
dll.
See bug 27710 (http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27710).
M3 works.
Knut
----- Message from dejan@xxxxxxxxxx on Wed, 4 Dec 2002 21:37:00 -0500 -----
| To:
| eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Subject:
| [eclipse-dev] Bug in launching run-time workbench |
Integration build 20021204 has a bug in launching the run-time workbench
that you may experience. It was caused by the recent changes in launch
dialog behaviour:
http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27711 Null pointer from
DebugPlugin.exec()
Depending on how many people are affected and if there is interest, we are
game for a rebuild. Just in case the releng team is trigger-happy, we have
versioned and updated the map files so that a build could commence at any
point. The nightly build will also contain the fix.
Regards,
Dejan Glozic, Ph.D.
Manager, Eclipse Platform Components
D2/MY7/8200/MKM
IBM Canada Ltd.
Tel. 905 413-2745 T/L 969-2745
Fax. 905 413-4854
----- Message from sonia_dimitrov@xxxxxxx on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 00:32:16 -0500 -----
| To:
| eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Subject:
| [eclipse-dev] [eclipse-build] Build N20021205 (Timestamp: 200212050010):Compile errors in build |
Build N20021205 (Timestamp: 200212050010): Compile errors in build. See attached compile logs.
----- Message from "Claude Knaus" <Claude_Knaus@xxxxxxx> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 04:52:22 -0500 -----
| To:
| eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Subject:
| Re: [eclipse-dev] [eclipse-build] I20021204 |
20021204 on linux-motif and -gtk prints out many lines with
301989888
301989888
...
to the console on startup. It's the hex value 0x12000000.
If eclipse is trying to tell me something, I don't know what it is :).
I didn't file a PR since I didn't know which component could be responsible.
-- Claude
----- Message from "Martin Aeschlimann" <Martin_Aeschlimann@xxxxxxx> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 11:38:03 +0100 -----
| To:
| eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Subject:
| Re: [eclipse-dev] [eclipse-build] I20021204 |
I filed http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27727 for this
"Claude Knaus"
<Claude_Knaus@oti. To: eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
com> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: [eclipse-dev] [eclipse-build] I20021204
eclipse-dev-admin@
eclipse.org
12/05/2002 10:52
AM
Please respond to
eclipse-dev
20021204 on linux-motif and -gtk prints out many lines with
301989888
301989888
...
to the console on startup. It's the hex value 0x12000000.
If eclipse is trying to tell me something, I don't know what it is :).
I didn't file a PR since I didn't know which component could be
responsible.
-- Claude
----- Message from "Tod Creasey" <Tod_Creasey@xxxxxxx> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 07:45:36 -0500 -----
| To:
| eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Subject:
| Re: [eclipse-dev] [eclipse-build] I20021204 |
This was a problem with the new keybinding stuff - it is fixed in HEAD and
therefore the nightly build. It is just an annoyance though - it is not a
symptom of something serious so don't worry about refreshing if you don't
want to.
Tod
"Claude Knaus"
<Claude_Knaus@oti. To: eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
com> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: [eclipse-dev] [eclipse-build] I20021204
eclipse-dev-admin@
eclipse.org
12/05/2002 04:52
AM
Please respond to
eclipse-dev
20021204 on linux-motif and -gtk prints out many lines with
301989888
301989888
...
to the console on startup. It's the hex value 0x12000000.
If eclipse is trying to tell me something, I don't know what it is :).
I didn't file a PR since I didn't know which component could be
responsible.
-- Claude
----- Message from dejan@xxxxxxxxxx on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:55:32 -0500 -----
| To:
| eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Subject:
| Re: [eclipse-dev] [eclipse-build] Build N20021205 (Timestamp: 200212050010):Compile errors in build |
This is an interesting failure that may be caused by PDE computing
classpaths incorrectly, but I need a confirmation.
PDE UI imports PDE plug-in;
PDE plug-in imports PDE Core and reexports it
PDE Core imports JDT Core and reeexports it
Question: Should PDE UI see JDT Core or not? Apparently, PDE thinks it
should (and JDT Core seem to agree, since there are no compilation errors).
However, build compiler thinks otherwise. Who is right?
Regards,
Dejan Glozic, Ph.D.
Manager, Eclipse Platform Components
D2/MY7/8200/MKM
IBM Canada Ltd.
Tel. 905 413-2745 T/L 969-2745
Fax. 905 413-4854
sonia_dimitrov@oti
.com To: eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent by: cc:
eclipse-dev-admin@ Subject: [eclipse-dev] [eclipse-build] Build N20021205 (Timestamp:
eclipse.org 200212050010):Compile errors in build
05/12/2002 12:32
AM
Please respond to
eclipse-dev
Build N20021205 (Timestamp: 200212050010): Compile errors in build. See
attached compile logs.(See attached file:
/builds/nightly/src/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.ui/temp.folder/pdeui.jar.bin.log)
----- Message from "Christophe Cornu" <Christophe_Cornu@xxxxxxx> on Thu, 5 Dec 2002 11:06:12 -0500 -----
| To:
| eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Subject:
| Re: [eclipse-dev] I20021204 does not start on Win NT 4 |
To NT users: build I20021204 does not run on this platform. As indicated in
PR27710, a fix has been released and will be available in version
v>20021205. Please go to PR27710 to follow up on this.
Thanks,
Chrix
"Knut Radloff"
<knut_radloff@oti. To: eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
com> cc:
Sent by: Subject: [eclipse-dev] I20021204 does not start on Win NT 4
eclipse-dev-admin@
eclipse.org
12/04/2002 05:39
PM
Please respond to
eclipse-dev
Is anyone running the 20021204 integration build on Windows NT?
I get an error message from the VM about a missing entry point in GDI32
dll.
See bug 27710 (http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27710).
M3 works.
Knut
_______________________________________________
eclipse-dev mailing list
eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-dev
_______________________________________________
eclipse-dev mailing list
eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-dev
Attachment:
/builds/nightly/src/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.ui/temp.folder/pdeui.jar.bin.log
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
/builds/nightly/src/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.ui/temp.folder/pdeui.jar.bin .log
Description: Binary data
