Re: [ecf-dev] Remote service question

[Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/20/2014 12:28 PM, Hallvard Trætteberg wrote:
> <stuff deleted>

> Yes, this was what I was thinking of. The advantage is that the 
> framework does a bit more for you, and you 'reuse' the async interface 
> that you already defined for the caller. 

Right.   It may very well make sense to create a new/customized 
distribution provider to do this for you, and ECF's provider 
architecture makes this very natural (e.g. you could even very simply 
extend an existing provider).

If you decide it would be worth it to do this we can certainly continue 
technical/implementation discussion in those directions (new/extended 
distribution provider).   Just let me/all know.

Scott