Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[ecf-dev] refactoring remote service features

Hi Folks,

There has been progress on the ECF 3.8.0 feature refactoring bug [1], and now I'm working on refactoring the remote services set of features.

Currently, we have a 'remote services sdk' feature (org.eclipse.ecf.remoteservice.sdk.feature) that essentially includes all the other remote service features. Just to be clear, all of these are able to run on both Equinox and non-Equinox frameworks, in Eclipse or on some other (e.g. OSGi server) runtime. Summary is:

API: core, discovery, remoteservices, remoteservices.rest, osgi rsa, servlet, soap Providers: discovery providers (e.g. slp, dnssd, zookeeper, zeroconf), and distribution providers (generic, r-osgi)
Examples (e.g. timeservice, event admin examples,  others, chat, etc).
Event Admin:   The ECF distributed event admin
Supporting API:  sharedobject, datashare
Generic Server:  generic server API and impl

All of the above features are included in the current org.eclipse.ecf.remoteservice.sdk.feature.

I'm thinking about how to reorganize things for [1] and I would like some feedback. Here's what I'm thinking:

1) Using/creating a finer-grained set of features...so that people can more easily get just the OSGi remote services APIs (discovery, distribution, rest, osgi, and supporting) and 2) The combination of providers implementing these APIs (discovery and distribution) that they wish to install 3) Remove Examples, Event Admin, and Generic Server from these finer-grained features (people will, of course still be able to get the examples) 4) Still provide an 'all-in-one' feature (org.eclipse.ecf.remoteservice.sdk) that contains everything.

With the work on 409787 that's already been done, we're not at all far from the 'finer-grained' as expressed above...as we have these finer-grained features for discovery API and providers, as well as distribution/remote service API and providers.

Please let know...as a comment on bug [1] if there are other aspects to the restructuring of remoteservices that are important to you that aren't reflected above.

Thanks,

Scott

[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=409787






Back to the top