Re: [ecf-dev] ECF Feature Restructuring

[Wim Jongman <wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Why are we filing this bug again? Because we want to have o.e.e.ssl in the org.eclipse.ecf feature?

Should we depend on the equinox quys to restructure their software so that we can restructure ours? I would just go ahead with what can can do ourselves and refactor the equinox dependent bundles into "optional" features.

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 12/8/2013 7:39 AM, Alex Blewitt wrote:

<stuff deleted>

Well, the supplemental bundle is supposed to provide services (e.g. NLS, Debug) that are frequently bound to the OSGi bundle but aren’t actually OSGi specific.

However, it doesn’t look like it includes the TrustEngine.

So...would someone please open a bug against Equinox for this?...perhaps we can get the TrustEngine class added to the Equinox supplemental (thus possibly reducing the number of features we need to have).

Please post the bug here, and I will join and make our features restructuring bug dependent upon it for added emphasis [1].

Thanks,

Scott

[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=409787

$ jar tf org.eclipse.equinox.supplement_1.5.100.v20130907-1147.jar | grep TrustEngine

$

Alex

_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev

_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev