Re: [ecf-dev] SSL - WAS: Re: build server backup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [ecf-dev] SSL - WAS: Re: build server backup

From: Wim Jongman <wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 09:59:26 +0200
Delivered-to: ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ZXrghQG+eDAF+OPiGzPXMn/FuK7up8rROM2Oak8vmlXWEqeSTWH8t59apsMGzqOZJC ubEtg8zH2KnZEMPo9IC0cXLp61EKeItLe9RkXM4CdzrKz8Y1LIqE5FML/lv7HrRNH4lo 4+N0j4dl32apeEGBhG2kbrQvTw/ukc3u21HQ0=
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ecf-dev>
List-help: <mailto:ecf-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev>, <mailto:ecf-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/ecf-dev>, <mailto:ecf-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

So it is not renewable?

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Markus Alexander Kuppe <ecf-dev_eclipse.org@lemmster.de> wrote:

On 05/30/2011 11:18 PM, Wim Jongman wrote:

> The site says that it is renewable so why not keep it.

It's just a class 1 certificate (email validation only) that expires
after 12 month.

Markus
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ecf-dev] SSL - WAS: Re: build server backup
  - From: Markus Alexander Kuppe

References:
- [ecf-dev] SSL - WAS: Re: build server backup
  - From: Wim Jongman
- Re: [ecf-dev] SSL - WAS: Re: build server backup
  - From: Markus Alexander Kuppe

Prev by Date: [ecf-dev] Salvo build error
Next by Date: Re: [ecf-dev] SSL - WAS: Re: build server backup
Previous by thread: Re: [ecf-dev] SSL - WAS: Re: build server backup
Next by thread: Re: [ecf-dev] SSL - WAS: Re: build server backup
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs