[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ecf-dev] ECF and felix
- From: Ivanhoe Abrahams <ivanhoeabrahams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:30:19 +0200
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=iIE3CAb7x7mg1q5twmv1pYDnjM7+S0hkI3CoEfHVs1UMANjYKTUo6oRbqpGSN5G0x0 iUAmQNz+pu51jhy3TyGzaduEIumf9yfG5MrAIxhNAXrpNarvLOlc4TKiTiOjqbJ9XB1T OA3HK3p3b1EWdCDYNu1sBMBlknxV5usPtyUS0=
Thanks for all the help. I can now at least "play" a bit further, with ECF on Felix.
About your suggestion (file a bug against Equinox)...I dont really
understand what it is that is going wrong so I would not even know how
to word such a bug.
If I find some time I will debug that part and and first try and understand the problem a bit more, before I log a bug.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Markus Alexander Kuppe <email@example.com>
On 02/23/2011 09:11 AM, Ivanhoe Abrahams wrote:
> But, this is not ideal, since one does not want to rely on the startup
> order of bundles in osgi.
> I guess I will have to dig a bit deeper to find out why the resolution
> does not happen the same as in equinox.
True, relying on startup order is far from ideal. I suspect this to be a
bug in the extension point registry on Felix not being dynamic aware.
You might wanna file a bug against Equinox.
ecf-dev mailing list