Re: [ecf-dev] Speed of the different discovery providers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [ecf-dev] Speed of the different discovery providers

From: Martin Petzold <mpetzold@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:41:05 +0100
Delivered-to: ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ecf-dev>
List-help: <mailto:ecf-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev>, <mailto:ecf-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/ecf-dev>, <mailto:ecf-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; de; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7

Am 26.01.2011 15:01, schrieb Markus Alexander Kuppe:

how fast a new service gets
discovery/a gone service gets undiscovered

I would like to optimize how fast a new service gets discovery/a goneservice gets undiscovered in a subnet. Could zookeeper be somehowfaster, even if SLP and JmDNS are more low level.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ecf-dev] Speed of the different discovery providers
  - From: Markus Alexander Kuppe
- Re: [ecf-dev] Speed of the different discovery providers
  - From: Wim Jongman

References:
- [ecf-dev] Speed of the different discovery providers
  - From: Martin Petzold
- Re: [ecf-dev] Speed of the different discovery providers
  - From: Markus Alexander Kuppe

Prev by Date: [ecf-dev] build/test breakage likely
Next by Date: Re: [ecf-dev] How can I make a new Bucky/Hudson project for my feature?
Previous by thread: Re: [ecf-dev] Speed of the different discovery providers
Next by thread: Re: [ecf-dev] Speed of the different discovery providers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs