[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ecf-dev] Some small ECF examples
- From: Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:15:15 -0700
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:18.104.22.168) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4
On 10/11/2010 5:58 PM, Jeff McAffer wrote:
I added EPL file to repo.
Great. This information would be good to have on the website and in the source files where developers are likely to see it. In another reply I also mentioned the benefits of using EDL...
Should I rename all projects/packages? What name will be correct?
What do the other ECF examples that are not at eclipse.org use?
I believe that these are the first examples that are not at eclipse.org
or eventually headed there (after IP process/review).
Although I have not discussed this with Pavel...and as it's his
contribution it's his decision of course...I would propose that we open
CQs for eventual move of these examples to eclipse.org. This is what we
have done with a number of contributions previously (i.e. made them
available for testing/review/improvement/comment/usage, etc while going
through the IP approval process), and unless Pavel objects I think we
should do this with these examples also. Hopefully this would help in
their distribution/use among ECF consumers.
I'm personally indifferent to EPL/EDL for example
contributions...although through experience if it makes consumption
easier for some it would seem fine to license them under both EPL and
EDL (as Toast has done). In summary...my advice would be to do whatever
makes it easiest for consumers...if that's both EPL and EDL then that
seems like the right choice to me.