[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ecf-dev] Eclipse ECF machine
- From: Wim Jongman <wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:48:18 +0200
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=CtFW21mYMkK8nTL4B5+peDrBMdePPCvGNvHlj4sG1iix/webZw8ppJoKFVsHNx3Xzz gXERjQIbgZ7eHLFyAR2RSssznWN24CO2Y4yd/CLa2CCQ81GFpoLNS+0nbsevrbYa0xQg XmxX2yO9dAFGKt/rwCtOlaf35DOUbza3pv57M=
we aim around $1500. We could stretch it a bit but not much, say around 1800.
You are right about the rails. It is just that $250 seems so expensive
that It makes me say stupid things like that. I'm sorry.
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Lance Albertson via RT <support@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon Aug 30 20:19:38 2010, wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> 16gigs memory and two processors. Low on the disk space...
>> We could get rid of a processor in favor of more disk?
>> Please let me know what you think.
> What price range are you aiming for? Perhaps I can come up with
> something better suited for you for the price you can afford. I spec out
> servers all the time.
>> almost 20% of the cost is made out of rack rails. (I envision that the
>> system is inserted into the rack once and then removed once too, 5
>> years later. If you consider a startup I suggest the rackrailsing
> You would be surprised how often you may need to take a machine out.
> Most of the time is related to some type of hardware fix or memory
> upgrade. Nothing is more irrating for us than poorly racked machines
> that are a pain to deal with. Its part of the investment of getting a
> realible server installed.
> Lance Albertson
> Systems Administrator / Architect
> Open Source Lab