Re: [ecf-dev] Troubles with Datashare over XMPP

[Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Pavel,

Thanks for sticking with this...we'll track down the issue one way or 
another.

Samolisov Pavel wrote:
> Thanks for your help, Scott!
>
> I try it on gmail.com only.
>
> I send data from samolisov@xxxxxxxxx to pavel.samolisov@xxxxxxxxx and
> add -Dsmack.debugEnabled=true to my run configuration.
>
> But it does not work correct :-(
>
> I send data (over DataSharing API Channel) from samolisov@xxxxxxxxx to
> pavel.samolisov@xxxxxxxxx
>
> In Smack Debug Window I can see:
>
> <message id="9Q3m5-4" to="pavel.samolisov@xxxxxxxxx/" type="chat">
>   <thread>N4E940</thread>
>   <properties xmlns="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/xmpp/properties";>
>     <property>
> <name>org.eclipse.ecf.internal.provider.xmpp.smack.ECFConnection.object</name>
>       <value
> type="java-object">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
> 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</value>
>     </property>
>   </properties>
> </message>
>
> And not long after:
>
> <message id="9Q3m5-4" to="samolisov@xxxxxxxxx/ecf.samoliF3FE20D2"
> from="pavel.samolisov@xxxxxxxxx/" type="error">
>   <thread>N4E940</thread>
>   <error code="400"/>
>   <properties xmlns="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/xmpp/properties";>
>     <property>
>
> <name>org.eclipse.ecf.internal.provider.xmpp.smack.ECFConnection.object</name>
>       <value
> type="java-object">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
> 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</value>
>     </property>
>   </properties>
> </message>
>   

I just want to clarify...which containers (and their associated 
connections) are sending/receiving the above?

It looks like the message sent is to="pavel.samolisov@xxxxxxxxx/"...is 
the following message (with

to="samolisov@xxxxxxxxx/ecf.samoliF3FE20D2") the *result/received message* or is it another message being sent?

If you could label the above with the sender container id and the receiver container id it would/will help.

In the mean time, I will take your code and try to run it with my own gmail accounts to see if I can determine what's happening.

Also, today I'm creating a datashare test case for the xmpp provider, which we can use to test this (and other behavior) with two arbitrary xmpp accounts.

Thanks,

Scott



> I do not understand what is this error?
>
> I have attached my code to the letter. Could you watch it?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Scott Lewis ÐÐÑÐÑ:
>   
> > Hi Pavel,
> >
> > I cannot currently duplicate this, so we're going to have to figure out
> > a way for me to collect enough information to debug.
> >
> > One initial thought...could you run both clients with Smack debugging on
> > (i.e. system property:  -Dsmack.debugEnabled=true) and capture the sent
> > and received packets for both clients?  Please edit out the passwords in
> > the xml data.
> >
> > Also, what is the XMPP server at samolisov@xxxxx (i.e. what server
> > software)?  And who configures it?
> >
> > Finally, if you wish you can run the tests in
> > org.eclipse.ecf.tests.provider.xmpp with these two accounts.  The tests
> > require system properties to specify the account/pw information...i.e.
> > here's an example
> >
> > -Dusername0=user0@xxxxxxxxx
> > -Dpassword0=user0pw
> > -Dusername1=user1@xxxxxxxxx
> > -Dpassword1=user1pw
> > -Dchat.room.name=ecf
> > -Dsmack.debugEnabled=true
> >
> > You will need to change the username?/password? info appropriately for
> > the two accounts.  The test that you should probably run is
> > org.eclipse.ecf.tests.provider.xmpp.remoteservice.RemoteServiceTest...many
> > of the other tests in that project test the chat room access (and gmail
> > has no chat room capability), so those tests aren't relevant.
> >
> > Finally, another option is that if you have access to creating an
> > account on the ya.ru system for me (e.g. a guest or test account), I
> > will try out the tests against my gmail/gtalk account.  So if you are
> > able to create an account on ya.ru xmpp server for me (or let me know
> > about accessing an existing account) please do so and I'll give it a try
> > when I can.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
> > Samolisov Pavel wrote:
> >     
> > > I'm sorry for my English, Scott.
> > >
> > > Yes, you are right. The sender is receiving the message but not the
> > > intended receiver.
> > >
> > >  
> > >       
> > > > > Are these XMPP servers able to communicate/federate?
> > > > >       
> > > > >           
> > > Yes, they are.
> > >
> > > Scott Lewis ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> > >  
> > >       
> > > > Hi Pavel,
> > > >
> > > > Samolisov Pavel wrote:
> > > >    
> > > >         
> > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello, folks!
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm playing with Datashare API over XMPP-container and have some
> > > > > problems.
> > > > >
> > > > > I create ecf.xmpp.smack container, connect to my jabber account
> > > > > "samolisov@xxxxx" (connect fine, I watch myself online), create channel
> > > > > with name "channel"
> > > > >
> > > > > IChannelContainerAdapter channelContainer = (IChannelContainerAdapter)
> > > > > _container.getAdapter(IChannelContainerAdapter.class);  
> > > > > channelContainer.createChannel(getNewID(CHANNEL_NAME),
> > > > > getChannelListener(), null);
> > > > >
> > > > > Bundle keep run.
> > > > >
> > > > > Late, I start this bundle with another config: I create ecf.xmpp.smack
> > > > > container, connect to my jabber account "samolisov@xxxxxxxxx" (connect
> > > > > fine, I watch myself online) and create channel with name "channel".
> > > > >
> > > > > And send message over channel to my another account:
> > > > >
> > > > > IChannel sender = getChannel();
> > > > > System.out.println("to = " + System.getProperty(XMPP_TO_ID));
> > > > > sender.sendMessage(IDFactory.getDefault().createID(IDFactory.getDefault().getNamespaceByName(XMPP_NAMESPACE),"samolisov@ya,ru")
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ,"Hello!".getBytes());
> > > > >
> > > > > Now are running two bundles with two containers.
> > > > >
> > > > > But! This data has sended to my container (i.e. container that send
> > > > > this
> > > > > data: "samolisov@xxxxxxxxx") and do not received by container that I
> > > > > send this message ("samolisov@xxxxx").
> > > > >         
> > > > >           
> > > > Your phrasing in the description above is a little unclear to me so I
> > > > want to check:  are you saying that the "Hello" message is received by
> > > > the container that's doing the sending (samolisov@xxxxxxxxx), rather
> > > > than the target account/container? (i.e. samolisov@ya,ru  ...I'm not
> > > > sure if the comma is a typo, but I assume it is).  So the sender is
> > > > receiving the message but not the intended receiver?
> > > >
> > > > And I can see that the two accounts are on different XMPP servers
> > > > (gmail.com and ya.ru).  Are these XMPP servers able to
> > > > communicate/federate?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Scott
> > > >
> > > >     
> > > >         
> > >   
> > >       
>
>
>