[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ecf-dev] GSoC ECF ideas.... Yahoo EPL'ed version or SIP/VoIP??
- From: Remy Chi Jian Suen <remy.suen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:23:18 -0400
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=daZYn5/bg9cMCG1mUTE/N72ag6cYjplyYM87/XpbXRGaHA2sLkDL2OniQ+LC+tlDWj 8ZE6yVQjQzC8S8tSRne3scmSi7hOHxHxwERa7jHPrV9pRNBTOmHZli7KiHfNlMFIBzx2 f182LF6wlXIjRSCVr2HvQ0q/qLLytSDfWThFY=
2009/3/27 Rajeev Sampath <rjvranga@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Regarding the yahoo implementation..... is there a specific reason for this
> project other than building a ECF specific implementation and doing it at
> own pace of ECF (without waiting till third party libraries get adapted
> whenever yahoo modifies its protocol) ? Since there's an already working
> provider supplied by OSU OSL, is there a specific reason to have another
> EPL'd implementation?
Correction, it is not "another EPL'd implementation" because jYMSG is
not under the EPL. The reason the Yahoo provider is distributed
through OSUOSL and not at Eclipse.org is because of this license
incompatibility. Thus, we are interested in having people implement
protocols under the EPL or an EPL-friendly license.