[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ecf-dev] Re: [riena-dev] Riena Update
I looked at this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connectionless_protocol
and I see what you are getting at. True connectionless protocols are
based on UDP or IP. As soon as you have TCP/IP you have a connection.
So I think what I meant was a protocol that does not have a persistent
connection. So a connection that is kept over the lifecyle of the
service proxy and is not closed after each remote service invocation.
So R-OSGi, the generic server provider and also XMPP over a XMPP
server, they are all holding on to a persistent connection all the
time independant of the remote service calls you are making ?
Am 13.01.2009 um 18:13 schrieb Scott Lewis:
Christian Campo wrote:
thanks. So that would mean you have a connected socket between the
various spaces all the time. So the point from the discussion with
Scott that I think that this make R-OSGi a connectionoriented
and not a connectionless provider. I am not saying this is good or
Like with Webservices (say SOAP or any other protocol) over HTTP its
possible to reuse a connected socket but typically you disconnect
after each call and connect for the next one.
Is that the correct assumption Jan ?
So that makes me still wonder if there is an ECF provider currently
available that is connectionless ?
By this definition of connectionless, not currently. So perhaps Riena
can/will/should be the first?
ecf-dev mailing list