Re: [ecf-dev] Move to 1.1 foundation

[Jeff McAffer <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Just a quick context comment on this.  Equinox is not "moving to 1.1".  
We have admitted the possibility of Equinox bundles to spec Foundation 
1.1 as their lowest execution environment.  Specifically we were 
motivated to by some changes in the OSGi spec and a desire to use 
classes like URI.  In particular, we are not wholesale updating all our 
bundles from 1.0 to 1.1.  Updates will happen on an as-needed basis.

As always we continue to minimize our dependencies and spec only what we 
need.  We strongly suggest that others do similarly.

Jeff

Scott Lewis wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Equinox is moving to requiring a minimum of Foundation 1.1 execution 
> environment
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=257109
>
> and ECF is going to move our own core bundles to 1.1 as well
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=257115
>
> The bundles currently at 1.0 and to-be-moved to 1.1 are:
>
> ch.ethz.iks.r_osgi.remote
> org.eclipse.ecf
> org.eclipse.ecf.datashare
> org.eclipse.ecf.filetransfer
> org.eclipse.ecf.identity
> org.eclipse.ecf.presence
> org.eclipse.ecf.protocol.msn
> org.eclipse.ecf.provider.filetransfer
> org.eclipse.ecf.provider.msn
> org.eclipse.ecf.provider.r_osgi
> org.eclipse.ecf.remoteservice
> org.eclipse.ecf.sharedobject
> org.eclipse.ecf.telephony.call
> org.eclipse.ecf.telephony.call.ui
> org.eclipse.ecf.tests
> org.eclipse.ecf.tests.call
> org.eclipse.ecf.tests.datashare
> org.eclipse.ecf.tests.filetransfer
> org.eclipse.ecf.tests.presence
> org.eclipse.ecf.tests.remoteservice
> org.eclipse.ecf.tests.sharedobject
>
> I would like to move these bundles to Foundation 1.1 next week (week 
> of Jan 5).  If there are any objections to this move please make them 
> known now.
>
> Thanksinadvance,
>
> Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ecf-dev mailing list
> ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev