Re: [ecf-dev] org.eclipse.ecf.presence.IFQID

[Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Eugen,

Eugen Reiswich wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> obviously I'm not the only one who's working on sunday :) I've tried 
> your new solution with the IFQID and it looks great!!! I will have a 
> deep look at it during the week and check out whether the remote 
> services are working properly with user/resource pairs, but my first 
> impression is that it works pretty good. Thanks Scott!

No problem.  Just keep those use cases coming.  Also Eugen...I need to 
hook up with you directly about work I've been doing on remote 
mgmt...using p2 and ECF remote services.  If you are available please 
let me know directly when we could chat via Skype, etc.


> > > You should not have to specify this property any longer:
> > >
> > > props.put(Constants.SERVICE_REGISTRATION_TARGETS, targetIDs);
>
> What is the right way to register remote services, just provide empty 
> Dictionary<?> parameters?

Yes.  Now that the 'on-demand' access to IRemoteServices is available 
(via getRemoteServiceReferences), it should be unnecessary to actually 
specify service registration targets on the service host as per above.

Thanks,

Scott