Re: [ecf-dev] CDC 1.0 or 1.1...that is (another) question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [ecf-dev] CDC 1.0 or 1.1...that is (another) question

From: Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:59:10 -0700
Delivered-to: ecf-dev@eclipse.org
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)

Hi Chris,

Chris Aniszczyk wrote:

+1, I'm fine with bumping up our requirements slightly to 1.1
I assume this would be a change scheduled for 3.0?


Yes, I expect so.

Scott

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ecf-dev] CDC 1.0 or 1.1...that is (another) question
  - From: Marcelo Mayworm

References:
- [ecf-dev] CDC 1.0 or 1.0...that is (another) question
  - From: Scott Lewis
- Re: [ecf-dev] CDC 1.0 or 1.1...that is (another) question
  - From: Scott Lewis
- Re: [ecf-dev] CDC 1.0 or 1.1...that is (another) question
  - From: Chris Aniszczyk

Prev by Date: Re: [ecf-dev] CDC 1.0 or 1.1...that is (another) question
Next by Date: Re: [ecf-dev] CDC 1.0 or 1.1...that is (another) question
Previous by thread: Re: [ecf-dev] CDC 1.0 or 1.1...that is (another) question
Next by thread: Re: [ecf-dev] CDC 1.0 or 1.1...that is (another) question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread