[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ecf-dev] PLEASE READ: Areas of focus for Ganymede/ECF 2.0

+1

for lead on Shared Editing API and cola real-time shared editing.

I have added bug 207530

"[Collab] Cola - Real-Time Shared Editor does not support multi-character operations" at https://bugs.eclipse.org/207530

Bug 204362 as reported by Remy

"[Collab] Cola shared editing does not handle EditorUpdateRequests" at https://bugs.eclipse.org/204362

--
Mustafa


On 10/24/07, Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+1 (for scott lead on file transfer, core, and remote services)

I've also added bugs to these three components as well as linked to existing bugs.

Thanks Remy, Markus, and Jan for responding so quickly.

Scott


Remy Chi Jian Suen wrote:
+1. I've attached a couple of bug links for the time being. I would
appreciate it if people commented on 183027 in particular.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=183027

Regards,
Rem

On 10/23/07, Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi All,

Coming out of the conference call today, I've proposed some major areas
of focus for ECF 2.0/Ganymede:

http://wiki.eclipse.org/ECF_Conference_Call_10.23.2007

Please take a look at this page and then do the following:

1) Review/comment on all the proposed areas of focus. Feel free to add
to/delete verbiage, connect bug reports to and/or change the content of
each area of focus.
2) If you are identified as one of the leads for an area of focus then
please:
a) *Respond to this email with a +1, 0, -1* to that you are
able/willing/desire to work in
the given area of focus.
b) Modify and detail the particular area of focus as you see fit

By identifying one or two leads for these 'components' of ECF, it's my
hope that we'll be able to move all of them forward more quickly and
more predictably, while also allowing people to work on the areas of ECF
that they are most interested in without overburdening anyone.

As we all know, this is an all volunteer project, and I would like to
make sure that everyone is satisfied/interested by what they are doing
with ECF, while trying to keep the project as a whole moving forward.
So please say so if I've made incorrect assumptions about interests,
availability, or anything else.

Thanks,

Scott



_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev

_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev


_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev