[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
It is really not a pressing need so no worry. Also I was not thinking about
something fancy / automated, but simply something any committer can do once
the release is over. For example for the platform, Kim is usually doing it
a few days after the release when we all unwind.
Good luck with the review,
From: Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF) developer mailing list." <ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 09/19/2007 08:48 PM
Subject: Re: [ecf-dev] Retagging
As has become usual, we're low on all things ECF (i.e. I do pretty much
everything...and have to split my time with a full time job), so
although I will try to do as you suggest, it might require some work on
build scripts that would take some time for me)...so regrettably I can't
promise it in the short term.
BTW, we are going to have to revoke 1.1 because the Foundation needs to
have us do a release review:
As you can probably tell, I'm a little irritated about it.
Pascal Rapicault wrote:
> In order to make it easy for users to get the source of a precise
> I would recommend you to tag each projects that went into an actual
> with a meaningful tag (for example R_1.0.0). Recently I had to get ECF
> and it was less than optimal, though not too painful.
> ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev mailing list