Re: [e4-dev] UISynchronize and timerExec

[Tom Schindl <tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I have no problem adding this, the class is marked as an SPI @noextend
so we are fine adding abstract methods but I'md make it look different
to Display#timerExec

I would suggest to have an API like this:

public abstract Condition scheduleRepeatingTask(Runnable r) {
}

public interface Condition {
    public boolean valid();
}

Tom

On 07.01.14 13:50, Wim Jongman wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Would it lead to something if I filed a bug to request the timerExec
> method in UISynchronize? Was it left out on purpose?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Wim
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> e4-dev mailing list
> e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>