Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [e4-dev] [EASE] "Work with" process

The distinction is whether you want to actually include/distribute Rhino, or require that the user install Rhino independently. If you are including Rhino that is easy as it is already approved for distribution in e4 and there is already a CQ so we are done. If you want this to be a dependency that the user installs separately then we would need a "Works With" dependency to document that. If that is what you want we can do that, although I think it is easier for the end user if we include Rhino in whatever feature provides the scripting support so they don't have an extra manual setup step.

John




From:        Paul Webster <pwebster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:        E4 Project developer mailing list <e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:        10/17/2013 09:51 AM
Subject:        Re: [e4-dev] [EASE] "Work with" process
Sent by:        e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx




On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:25 AM, DAUSSY Arthur <arthur.daussy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi All,

 

In order to fully integrate EASE  into E4 repository I have to ask you about “Work With” (http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/Eclipse_Policy_and_Procedure_for_3rd_Party_Dependencies_Final.pdf).

In order to use EASE, we need to “Work With Rhino engine to interpret _javascript_ (https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3530). So I think the good process is to publish this on the mail list and get the approval of the PMC.

 Is that correct?


Hi Arthur,

If you want to use 1.7 R2 it looks like we've already met the process requirements for using it in eclipse.e4, and you're approved to go ahead with it.

You can decide later if you want to move up to 1.7 R4 and we would need to open a new CQ.

Sorry for the confusion.

Later,
Paul


--
Paul Webster
Hi floor.  Make me a sammich! - GIR
_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev


Back to the top