Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [e4-dev] Naming convention question

I like “application model” which is actually part of the “presentation model”.

The only think is that people might confuse “application model” with “domain model”.

 

Best regards,

 

Kai

 

From: e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lars Vogel
Sent: Sonntag, 29. Januar 2012 01:23
To: E4 Project developer mailing list
Subject: Re: [e4-dev] Naming convention question

 

No opinion? In this case I select option 2.)

2012/1/27 Lars Vogel <lars.vogel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hello,

 

I would like to have a consistent naming for my Eclipse 4 tutorial (and upcoming book). Therefore I would like to know if  how we would like to call the model for Eclipse 4:

 

1.) The modeled workbench

2.) The application model

 

I personally like the the second term. I believe the project started with 1.) but I think workbench is a technical term and I would prefer to see 2.) in usage.

 

Any opinions?

 

Best regards, Lars

 

--
Lars
http://www.vogella.de - Eclipse, Android and Java Tutorials
http://www.twitter.com/vogella - Lars on Twitter



 

--
Lars
http://www.vogella.de - Eclipse, Android and Java Tutorials
http://www.twitter.com/vogella - Lars on Twitter

Back to the top