Re: [e4-dev] Q: Uniqueness of model element ids

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [e4-dev] Q: Uniqueness of model element ids

From: Brian de Alwis <briandealwis@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:57:14 -0500
Delivered-to: e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=exntInT/uPMUq02JA6Abx3ZhWlFPT2WgEoT3BvSBAuEAmazXCRfER10C8/1wLNLEat PXqZXBwGqBkJ94E36aBEngWXSdRR/3bWj4pP0E28EWJuhpkRWOn4I7tN4/Gu/BxkuxL9 WXL96rBcGEYdRk9AKdpHFY7bWpQp4WajshBew=
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/e4-dev>
List-help: <mailto:e4-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev>, <mailto:e4-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev>, <mailto:e4-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 28-Jan-2010, at 11:48 AM, Remy Suen wrote:
> The id of an MApplicationElement should not have to be unique. However, the 'xmi:id' attribute within the e4xmi file must be unique.

Ah, thank you Remy — that is the nugget that I was missing!

References:
- [e4-dev] Q: Uniqueness of model element ids
  - From: Brian de Alwis
- Re: [e4-dev] Q: Uniqueness of model element ids
  - From: Remy Suen

Prev by Date: Re: [e4-dev] Q: Uniqueness of model element ids
Next by Date: Re: [e4-dev] Revise milestone schedule?
Previous by thread: Re: [e4-dev] Q: Uniqueness of model element ids
Next by thread: Re: [e4-dev] Q: Uniqueness of model element ids
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs