RE: [dtp-pmc] Status and bug counts

["Linda Chan" <LChan@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

For 133136: import of connection profiles fails

I propose we verify with the Reporter or his team, if not already, whether fixing it in 1.0 would block their testing.

 

Linda

-----Original Message-----
From: dtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Sheila Sholars
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 2:14 PM
To: dtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [dtp-pmc] Status and bug counts

If 0.7 adopters are not impacted by these 2 bugs (which I believe is the case), I would vote for keeping 0.7 frozen and fixing for 1.0.

Regards,
Sheila
"Linda Chan" <LChan@xxxxxxxxxxx>

"Linda Chan" <LChan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: dtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

03/24/2006 11:44 AM

Please respond to
DTP PMC mailing list

To	"DTP PMC mailing list" <dtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [dtp-pmc] Status and bug counts

For 133120, the compiler error is specific to building on Eclipse 3.2, where a lot of plaform classes have moved to different jar files.  
This does not need to be fixed in 0.7 release.

Linda

-----Original Message-----
From: dtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of jograham@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 10:49 AM
To: dtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [dtp-pmc] Status and bug counts



PMC,

Testing of DTP 0.7 RC1 has resulted in a number of bug entries. Of these,
two are reported as blocking:

133120: oda.flatfile.ui compile errors
133136: import of connection profiles fails

I suspect the first can be easily sorted out by Linda. The second is
serious, and no doubt blocking the tests described in the report, but
otherwise has limited impact (which is to say, if this were not blocking
the tests and just noticed during regular usage, I would expect it to be a
"normal" or perhaps "major" bug).

I addition, there are a number of minor clean up issues that we could look
at (text on labels etc.).

My question to the PMC is this: Since we are awaiting IP clearance, should
we open 0.7 back up to fix these bugs, or should we keep 0.7 code frozen
and fix them in head for 1.0? My preference would be for the latter, and
the bug fixes will be available in the 1.0 stream builds which will start
next week. So, can the community continue with the 1.0 stream (esp. for
133136), or do we need to fix these in the 0.7 branch too?

Regards,
John Graham
Eclipse Data Tools Platform PMC Chair
Staff Software Engineer, Sybase, Inc.
http://dataplat.blogspot.com/

_______________________________________________
dtp-pmc mailing list
dtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dtp-pmc
_______________________________________________
dtp-pmc mailing list
dtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dtp-pmc