[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] (no subject)
|
Your target would be of an Ihost class, and would likely
best created by a dynamic system type provider:
http://dsdp.eclipse.org/help/latest/topic/org.eclipse.rse.doc.isv/reference/extension-points/org_eclipse_rse_core_systemTypeProviders.html
You cannot, unfortunately, dynamicall register subsystems,
they need to be fixed at the time the IHost is created.
But with your dynamic system type provider you have
everything in the hand to have it appear as needed at
creation time.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tobias
> Södergren XT
> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 2:23 PM
> To: Target Management developer discussions
> Subject: RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] (no subject)
>
> Hi Martin, thanks for your answer!
>
> I would still want to re-use as much as possible from RSE,
> what would you suggest would be the "correct" way forward for me?
>
> A host can have many targets and they can appear and
> dissapear dynamically. Should I handle each target as a
> "top-level" element and connect subsystems to them? What
> class should the target then implement and can I dynamically
> register subsystems on each target?
>
> Best regards,
> Tobias Södergren
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Oberhuber, Martin
> Sent: den 15 september 2008 17:33
> To: Target Management developer discussions
> Subject: RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] (no subject)
>
> Hello Tobias,
>
> I have not checked in detail, but I'm afraid that in order to
> implement a structure like outlined by you, you won't be able
> to re-use the existing
> FileServiceSubSystem
> ProcessServiceSubSystem
> classes.
>
> I think the main problem is that in the SystemView code,
> which renders the tree, there are some assumptions made about
> the relationship of elements (i.e. stuff that can be adapted to an
> ISystemViewElementAdapter) and their hierarchy.
>
> As far as I can remember, the code does walk up/down the tree
> in order to associate such elements with a given subsystem,
> associate filters with filter references and so on. In your
> proposal, these assumptions about parent/child relationships
> are at least partially broken.
>
> Long story short: Of course you can create your own subsystem
> and implement your own methods of getChildren(), adapter etc
> in order to return any structure you like.
> But re-using the existing subsystem code (unchanged!) in such
> an environment is not specified, and unlikely to work ...
> feel free to try it out, and let me know if it works, but I'm
> guessing that you'd be running into trouble.
>
> Allowing such re-use in the future is interesting, and there
> are existing discussions in that direction e.g.
>
> [filters] Grouping filters across subsystems
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=164807
>
>
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/DSDP-TM_Proposal_for_RSE_Hierarchy_by_
> Dave_Dykstal_2005x11x09
>
> But I assume that such work will likely need changes in the
> extension point structure and most likely changes in the
> SystemView code (not even talking about the other views like
> TableView, Monitor).
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind
> River Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
> http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Tobias Södergren
> > XT
> > Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 2:27 PM
> > To: Target Management developer discussions
> > Subject: [dsdp-tm-dev] (no subject)
> >
> > Hi TM gurus!
> >
> > I'm trying to understand how to implement the following tree:
> >
> > [Connection]
> > ^---[SubSystem]
> > ^---[Target 1]
> > ^---[Processes]
> > ^---Process 1
> > ^---Process 2
> > ^---[Remote files]
> > ^---File 1
> > ^---File 2
> > ^---[Target 2]
> > ^---[Processes]
> > ^---Process 1
> > ^---Process 2
> > ^---[Remote files]
> > ^---File 1
> > ^---File 2
> >
> > I've got the Connection, SubSystem and Target working, but
> I'd like to
> > reuse the AbstractFileService and ProcessService with
> complementary UI
> > for the remote IRemoteFile and IHostProcess.
> > I guess that there exist some UI/AbstractResource that
> operates on an
> > IFileService implementation.
> > I've implemented the AbstractFileService but I haven't
> found the way
> > to create the tree above.
> > Can/should I use an extension point and register something on the
> > Target, should I implement
> > getChildren() in my TargetResourceAdapter that returns an [Remote
> > files] instance, or what?
> >
> > Any help is appreciated.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Tobias Södergren
> > _______________________________________________
> > dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
> > dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
> dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
> dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev
>
