[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] TM IP Log Double Bookkeeping

Martin --

Yes this does pay off. I hear that other projects really have to scramble sometimes to get their logs updated for this review. Thanks for staying on our case.

-- Dave

On May 13, 2008, at 7:14 PM, Oberhuber, Martin wrote:

Dear TM Committers,
Since a "frozen" version of our IP Log needs to be sent in to Eclipse Legal
by Thursday COB, I reviewed our double bookkeeping to find any inconsistencies
between bugzilla and our manual tm-log.csv.
You might be interested in hearing that I found several inconsistencies:
  • 1 typo in the bugzilla number  in tm-log.csv
  • 2 contributed patches not mentioned in tm-log.csv
  • 2 bugzilla bugs with contributed patches but not yet marked FIXED
  • 2 bugzilla bugs with contributed patches but without "contributed" kwd
  • 2 bugzilla bugs with rogue "contributed" kwd where nothing had actually been contributed (this happens sometimes when cloning a bug)
You see that it pays off to do the double bookkeeping.
Please make sure that we continue doing it with utmost diligence!
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
dsdp-tm-dev mailing list