Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] Should we ask for delaying M6 until Fri Apr 11 (4 days

[Xuan Chen <xuanchen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree, too.  +1.

And for NL strings, yes, we don't care
if it is a M6 build or not.   I just need to drop a build which no
check pii errors.

Thanks,

Xuan Chen,  Problem Determination Tools for iSeries
(905) 413-3769 T/L 313-3769
xuanchen@xxxxxxxxxx

David McKnight/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

04/04/2008 08:22 AM

Please respond to
Target Management developer discussions <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Target Management developer discussions <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	Target Management developer discussions <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject	Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] Should we ask for delaying M6 until Fri Apr        11        (4        days)?

I agree it.  It's too tight a period to wrap this up by april 7 given
the API leak changes. 

+1 

____________________________________
David McKnight    
Phone:   905-413-3902 , T/L:  969-3902
Internet: dmcknigh@xxxxxxxxxx
Mail:       D1/YFY/8200/TOR
____________________________________

David Dykstal <daviddykstal@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

04/04/2008 08:16 AM

Please respond to
Target Management developer discussions <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Target Management developer discussions <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] Should we ask for delaying M6 until Fri Apr 11        (4        days)?

I think this is a reasonable plan. I would like to finish addressing the
leakage reports cleanly. 

Unless I'm mistaken, IBM does not care if M6 is declared for the purposes
of doing the string capture. We will capture from whatever build is currently
absorbed, so an I-build should be fine. Xuan -- can you check on this?

-- Dave 

On Apr 4, 2008, at 6:18 AM, Oberhuber, Martin wrote: 

TM committers, 
  
The API Leakage issues that we uncovered recently thanks to the 
new API Tooling have apparently delayed our release schedule
for M6. 
  
I think that at least from the point of view of the Ganymede train,
we should have a chance delaying our M6 release from Mon Apr 07
to Fri Apr 11 because we're not (yet) in any EPP package and 
we don't have any upstream consumers: 
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Ganymede#Milestones_and_Release_Candidates
  
My question is, would you - committers - be OK with the 4 day
delay? I know that there is an NLS freeze at IBM on Apr 7th,
but perhaps we could give them an I-build with the NLS strings
such that we can continue testing and fixing until the 11th?
  
I'll await your comments today and if I don't get any negative
response I'll ask the planning-council about delaying our M6.
  
Thanks, 
-- 
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind
River 
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member 
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
  
  
_______________________________________________
dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev 
_______________________________________________
dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev
_______________________________________________
dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev