| [dsdp-tm-dev] Re: [api] RemoteCommandShell should be API |
ok
_______________________
David Dykstal
david_dykstal@xxxxxxxxxx
"Oberhuber,
Martin"
<Martin.Oberhuber To
@windriver.com> David Dykstal/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS,
"Kushal Munir" <kmunir@xxxxxxxxxx>
01/31/2007 09:22 cc
AM "Target Management developer
discussions"
<dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
[api] RemoteCommandShell should be
API
We think that RemoteCommandShell, which is currently internal, should be
API
such that extenders can officially derive from it when creating their own
shell
subsystem.
Note that ServiceCommandShell, which derives from RemoteCommandShell,
already is API.
Please add notes / discuss on
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=172323
The change should be made when their is sufficient consensus.
Committers please respond with "ok"
Thanks,
--
Martin Oberhuber
Wind River Systems, Inc.
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm