[dsdp-tm-dev] [api] SystemView should be internal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[dsdp-tm-dev] [api] SystemView should be internal

From: "Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:45:11 +0100
Delivered-to: dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev>
List-help: <mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev>, <mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev>, <mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcdFP0qBg5VSt2EURva/wbivN/GWJwAC/P8QAADZwxA=
Thread-topic: [api] SystemView should be internal

We think that SystemView should not be accessible for extenders directly

and thus be made internal.

Please add notes / discuss on

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=172326

The change should be made when their is sufficient consensus.

Committers please respond with "ok"

Thanks,
--
Martin Oberhuber
Wind River Systems, Inc.
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm

Follow-Ups:
- [dsdp-tm-dev] Re: [api] SystemView should be internal
  - From: Kushal Munir
- Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] [api] SystemView should be internal
  - From: javier . montalvoorus
- RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] [api] SystemView should be internal
  - From: Stieber, Uwe

Prev by Date: [dsdp-tm-dev] [api] RemoteCommandShell should be API
Next by Date: [dsdp-tm-dev] FW: Advanced Remote Launching (was: Is TM/RSE right for us?)
Previous by thread: [dsdp-tm-dev] [api] RemoteCommandShell should be API
Next by thread: RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] [api] SystemView should be internal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top