[dsdp-tm-dev] RE: SubSystemConfiguration vs. SubSystemFactory ??

["Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The latter.

Only one extension point for the factory.

The factory would create the subsystem, passing in an
initial configuration (which the subsystem may modify later).
The subsystem would return its configuration.

Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Dykstal [mailto:david_dykstal@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 4:13 PM
> To: Oberhuber, Martin
> Cc: David McKnight; Target Management developer discussions; 
> Kushal Munir
> Subject: RE: SubSystemConfiguration vs. SubSystemFactory ??
> 
> Interesting idea.
> 
> In most cases where we have to grab the 
> SubSystemConfiguration from the
> subsystem we would continue to do so.  So its possible this 
> won't be as bad
> as I initially suspected. This is a pretty pervasive hit though and it
> affects the extension points. Would you expect to define both subystem
> factory and subsystem configuration extension points 
> independently or would
> a subsystem factory provide a subsystem configuration to the 
> subsystems it
> creates?
> _______________________
> David Dykstal
> david_dykstal@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
>