Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] Re: [platform-team-dev] RE: what are the Platformplans for Team/FTP?

Thanks for the notes Michael.
 
Yes I could imagine that DSDP / Target Management becomes the home for
Team / Extras in the future. We'll need to discuss this internally since we also
don't want to get side-tracked too much into things that are not our core
competence - though it seems that Target Management is at least better aligned
with the Team/Extras stuff than Platform/Team.
 
For the Commons Net, let's see if EMO approves and then think about where
to put it. But I agree that plugin and inter-project dependencies are not easy
to decide. Perhaps if we inherit Team/Extras, the Commons Net would make
most sense in our project too.
 
Any comments from the other experts on the distribution list?
 
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Oberhuber - WindRiver, Austria
+43(662)457915-85
 


From: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Valenta
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 11:02 PM
To: Generic team support framework
Cc: platform-team-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx; John Arthorne; Scott Lewis; Harm Sluiman; Target Management developer discussions; platform-team-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [dsdp-tm-dev] Re: [platform-team-dev] RE: what are the Platformplans for Team/FTP?


Martin,

Regarding your question about making the potential inclusion of Jakarta Commons Net into DSDP benefitial to a wider audience, I'm not sure what the right answer is. I don't think that trying to push it into the Platform is a good idea since, if everyone did this, the Platform would become too large. I seem to recall reading some blog postings about having an Eclipse Commons or something similar. That strikes me as something that could be generally useful to a lot of Eclipse projects. 'm not sure if anything came of those discussions though.

Regarding the Team/Extras feature, the main contributing factor to the state of the this feature is that we do not have a use for the funtionality it provides in the Platform (and hence have never really put the in the effort required to make it "real"). We have tried to find a more suitable home for it in the past but there was little interest from the other Eclipse projects at the time. If the DSDP project has a need for this type of funtionality, then perhaps you should start out as the owner of the funtionality. There is no particular reason to be tied to anything that is currently found in the Team/Extras feature. I think you can treat these as an interesting experiment but should not feel bound to reuse anything from there unless it makes sense for you. If some of the APIs that are designed in DSDP to handle target management turn out to be more generally useful, they could be pushed into some sort of Commons or Component project (assuming one is created at some point).

I agree with you that the EFS is interesting but is only a small part of the puzzle. I'll make sure to check out your RSE once the dust from the 3.2 release settles.

Michael



"Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: platform-team-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/16/2006 07:59 AM

Please respond to
Generic team support framework

To
"Target Management developer discussions" <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <platform-team-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Scott Lewis" <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Arthorne/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA, Harm Sluiman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
cc
Subject
[platform-team-dev] RE: what are the Platform plans for Team/FTP?





Hello Michael,
 
1. Good quality protocol implementations:
I agree that these may weel be key to success. For our project, we have
submitted a contribution questionnaire for the Jakarta Commons Net
package, so that should bring in a commercial quality FTP client.
What do you think - how would we go ahead contributing this in a form
that is most beneficial for everyone?
 
We also have an ssh / sftp client in our Repository (using jsch), and
Atsuhiko Yamanaka is offering an ssh / sftp implementation for
Team/Extras from his website (www.jcraft.com) which he declared he
would be willing to contribute to Eclipse.
 
I'm not sure where to get a commercial grade WebDAV client, or who
could improve the existing one.
 
The ECF FTP implementation is more an experimental proof of concept
for the ECF fileshare API for now as far as I know.
 
2. Target Management APIs:
We think that filesharing is only part of the story of managing remote targets.
Our APIs also address remote processes, remote shells, remote search
plus they are open for managing any type of remote resource in what we
call "subsystems".
It looks like particular power comes from combining remote shell / remote
search / remote file APIs.
 
Filesharing is certainly the most well-known aspect of managing remote
resources, and EFS is a first step towards unifying remote file access.
We are working on an article that will contrast EFS with the APIs that
we have.
 
We should certainly collaborate in getting the APIs right and working towards
common solutions.
 
3. UI and advanced functionality:
Compared to the Team/Extras "Site Explorer", our Remote Systems Explorer
(RSE, see http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm) has a similar view (Remote Systems
View) but advanced features:
  • Local Caching of remote information
  • Advanced properties of remote objects
  • Sorting, Filtering, Table Views; Team sharing of filters and properties
  • Extension points for arbitrary types of remote resources, not just files
All that at the cost of more plugin dependencies, of course (I don't think we are
ready for RCP apps, though we are refactoring towards better separation of
functionality). Feel free to test our RSE - It's still in an early M1 stage after
quite some refactoring but following the steps from the release notes you
should get the idea of what we are doing.
 
I could imagine that eventually, functionality for remote access can be contributed
through a single extension point and be available immediately
  - for the Workspace (through EFS)
  - for advanced remote management (through our RSE)
  - for RCP apps (through your Site Explorer).
 
Let's stay in touch and collaborate on making that happen.
 
Cheers,
Martin
--
Martin Oberhuber - WindRiver, Austria
+43(662)457915-85

 


From: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Valenta
Sent:
Friday, May 12, 2006 8:57 PM
To:
Target Management developer discussions
Subject:
[dsdp-tm-dev] Fw: [platform-team-dev] What are the Platform plansfor Team/FTP?



----- Forwarded by Michael Valenta/Ottawa/IBM on 05/12/2006 02:56 PM -----
Michael Valenta/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: platform-team-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/12/2006 01:54 PM

Please respond to
Generic team support framework


To
Generic team support framework <platform-team-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
platform-webdav-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, platform-team-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx, Target Management developer discussions <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, platform-team-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
Re: [platform-team-dev] What are the Platform plans for Team/FTP?








Martin,


At the current time, the FTP/WebDAV plugins are not being actively developed or maintained and there is currently no plan for this to change (although interest and involvement by other Eclipse projects would go a long way in changing this). The page at the following link describes how to access all the plugins that are found in the FTP/WebWAV feature:


http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/%7Echeckout%7E/platform-vcm-home/plugins/target/target-project-sets/readme.html


Just to summarize what is in this feature:


1) A WebDAV client and an FTP client that are plugins but have minimal dependencies on other plugins

2) A provisional target management API that has bindings for both WebDAV and FTP

3) Some UI and advanced funtionality that is built on top of the provisional API


The key to the success of points 2 and 3 is having production quality implementations for FTP and WebDAV (point 1). We (the Team/CVS team) have not had enough manpower to justify this effort. Many people have expresed an interest in these plugisn but, up until now, there has been no committment from an Eclipse project to dedicate resources to these plugins (or identify suitable alternatives that can be used by Eclipse).


In regards to point 2, In 3.2, the org.eclipse.core.filesystem plugin was introduced. This API is similar in many respects to the provisional target API. Moving forward, this should be the API that is used for managing remote files (i.e. we don't want two APIs that do roughly the same thing). The added advantage is that Resources plugin using the EFS as the file system for workspace projects.


In regards to point 3, we didn't have much time in 3.2. to dedicate to EFS related UI. I suspect EFS related UI pieces will start to appear from various places in 3.3.

As for the ECF, I was not aware they had an FTP client and I can't find any information on their site but I will follow up with them to get more information. As for joining forces, I think that would be great.

Cheers,

Michael


"Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: platform-team-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/12/2006 05:42 AM

Please respond to
Generic team support framework


To
<platform-team-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <platform-webdav-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Target Management developer discussions <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
[platform-team-dev] What are the Platform plans for Team/FTP?









Hello,

The DSDP-Target Management Project deals with connecting to remote
systems
and working on them through a variety of protocols. Some of our clients
are also interested in FTP. See http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm

I was wondering what the Platform's plans are for the Team/Extras FTP
component. I looked at the sources that come with the 3.2rc3 Team/Extras
package, and all APIs are declared provisional. I couldn't even find
the plugin in the Platform CVS Repository to see when latest changes
have been made and who is working on it.

So, I hope to get some answers on this mailing list -
* Whom can I contact regarding Team/FTP?
* What are the plans going forward?

It might make sense to join forces. Our project is working on common
protocol abstractions, including data transfer; Eclipse Communication
Framework (ECF) also did an FTP implementation, see
http://www.eclipse.org/ecf

Thanks,
Martin

--
---------------------------------/()\-----------------------------------
Dipl.-Ing. Martin Oberhuber        mailto:martin.oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Member of Technical Staff          Phone  (UTC +1h): +43 (662) 457915-85
Wind River Systems (Salzburg) GmbH              Fax: +43 (662) 457915-6
Jakob-Haringer-Str.8, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria  http://www.windriver.com
----------------------- How Smart Things Think -------------------------

_______________________________________________
platform-team-dev mailing list
platform-team-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-team-dev
_______________________________________________
platform-team-dev mailing list
platform-team-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-team-dev_______________________________________________
platform-team-dev mailing list
platform-team-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-team-dev


Back to the top