Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [dsdp-pmc] Please Vote: TmL 0.1 Release Review

Thanks Martin,

I'll make those changes and submit a revised set of slideware to the web
site.

A few comments inline below.

Regards

-E

-----Original Message-----
From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 4:51 PM
To: DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] Please Vote: TmL 0.1 Release Review

Hi Eric,

I'm ok with shooting for a Release Review givn that TmL has been around
for long enough, and it looks like you'll want to finish off some CQ'2

+1 from Martin O

a couple comments for your release review slides though:

* Title slide: Many previous reviews had the version number
  of the development process by which the review is done printed
  on it. I'm not sure if this is still recommended (couldn't find
  such requirement in the docs), but in case you want to add it --
  Currently v2.4 of August 2008

EC> Is it a 1 line item on the title slide, or should I put it in the
master slide in the lower left corner, for example?

  http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/development_process.php
  http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources

* Slide 3 (Background) -- So back in 2006, you already planned
  a 0.1 release for Oct 10, 2008?
  - You may want to elaborate a bit more on the "Goal". What 
    about full end-to-end simulation? I'd like to know how the
    current vision of TmL compares to th eoriginal project proposal
    http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/tml/
    http://wiki.eclipse.org/DSDP/TML/BoardReport2008

EC> I will need to look at the original incubation proposal and
reconcile it with the current plan.  I don't think we are far off the
original plan, but that is a good data point to have for the review.
The end-to-end simulation is being implemented for Galileo under the
pretext of the Device Proxy.

* Slide 4 (Features) -- incorrect URL should be
  http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=dsdp.tml
  but that is the 0.3 plan already... You'll probably
  need to generate a static HTML version of the 0.1
  plan until bug 238434 is fixed
  https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=238434
  - Also, what about the Emulator Framework?

EC> I wondered about that one.  Thanks.

* Slide 10 (Bugzilla) -- major, critical etc. are
  Severities and not Priorities

EC> Doh.

* Slide 11 (Bugzilla) -- please label your tables!
  e.g. "Open bugs by Target Milestone" ... the current
  tables are extremely confusing.
  Also, why did you change the order of severities?
  Enhancement should be last.

EC> I'll blame Fabio for that. :-)

* Slide 12 (Standards)
  If it's a standard, what is the RFC number or similar?
  What does the "number not changing" text mean?

EC> I will put in the RFC.  For the other, refer to bug 244478.  I'll
take it out because it's not for the review.  It was when I was passing
around the slides for internal review.

Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River Target
Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CLONINGER
> ERIC-DCP874
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 6:52 AM
> To: DSDP PMC list
> Subject: FW: [dsdp-pmc] Please Vote: TmL 0.1 Release Review
> 
> I got this from Shigeki, but I didn't see it on dsdp-pmc, so I'm 
> hoping it was a routing error... :-)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: moride.shigeki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:moride.shigeki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Shigeki Moride
> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 7:24 PM
> To: CLONINGER ERIC-DCP874; DSDP PMC list
> Subject: Re: [dsdp-pmc] Please Vote: TmL 0.1 Release Review
> 
> +1 from Shigeki
> 
> Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:30:58 -0400
> "CLONINGER ERIC-DCP874" <ericc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hello PMC,
> > 
> > I would like to announce that the Tools for mobile Linux
> (TmL) project
> 
> > is in the process of preparing a release.  This release will be 
> > labeled
> > 0.1 and will be our first release since being incubated in 2006.  
> > Slides in support of the release are available in PDF form
> on the TmL
> > web site at
> >  
> >
> http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tml/reviews/ReleaseReview_DSDP-TmL
> _0_1.pdf.
> > 
> > I will be happy to answer any questions or concerns you may have on 
> > the release.
> > 
> > Please vote in favor of this release after you've reviewed our 
> > materials so that we can continue the review process.
> > 
> > Thank you
> > 
> > --
> > Eric Cloninger
> > Sr. Product Manager, MOTODEV Studio for Linux Eclipse Tools
> for Mobile
> 
> > Linux Project Lead ericc@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > _______________________________________________
> > dsdp-pmc mailing list
> > dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc
> 
> --
> Shigeki Moride
> moride.shigeki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> moride@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-pmc mailing list
> dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc
> 
_______________________________________________
dsdp-pmc mailing list
dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc


Back to the top