Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [dsdp-pmc] PLEASE VOTE: Contribution Questionnaires for MTJ Reboot 
One more update:
Hugo updated the Antenna CQ to reflect the intended use/porting to use the Antlr 3.0 library, which is pre-approved by Eclipse.
"Danke" Martin for all the valuable input, and Thanks Doug for the "thumbs up" 

:)

I'll go ahead and update the CQ's to move them along the process.

-Christian



Gaff, Doug wrote:

I'm +1 on everything now. I'm looking forward to hearing how the Antenna
stuff progresses. Christian and I im'd about it on Friday.

Christian can do the +1's. I just wanted to make sure we discussed it
here.


-----Original Message-----
From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-
bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 9:36 AM
To: Paula Gustavo-WGP010; Raniere Hugo-wha006; DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] PLEASE VOTE: Contribution Questionnaires for
MTJ Reboot

Ok,

Looks like Hugo has revoked the Antenna request and explained
The Jetty Piggyback; I'm also good with getting in TrueZip
For bootstrapping.

So I'm +1 for all remaining requests -- how long do we want
To keep the ballot open, and who wants to give the +1 on the
CQ's on behalf of the PMC?

Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm




-----Original Message-----
From: Paula Gustavo-WGP010 [mailto:wgp010@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Samstag, 05. April 2008 02:58
To: Oberhuber, Martin; Raniere Hugo-wha006; DSDP PMC list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] PLEASE VOTE: Contribution
Questionnaires for MTJ Reboot

Hi martin,

About the Jetty question, our initial plan on MTJ is to
provide it as a
standalone download without any additional eclipse feature, similar

to

what currently happen with eclipseME (that might change in
the future).
MTJ will depend on Eclipse Platform and JDT and one of the platform
functionalities that we will use is Jetty.

:)
gep

-----Original Message-----
From: Oberhuber, Martin [mailto:Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: sexta-feira, 4 de abril de 2008 19:48
To: Raniere Hugo-wha006; DSDP PMC list; Paula Gustavo-WGP010
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] PLEASE VOTE: Contribution
Questionnaires for MTJ
Reboot

Hi all,

After answers from Hugo and more investigation, I'm

-1 for antenna.preprocessor because the version requested
   would be unusable due to ANTLR dependency. MTJ will need
   to first upgrade Antenna to new ANTLR outside Eclipse,
   and then file a CQ for the updated antenna.

+1 for TrueZIP since it looks nice, and in order to
   bootstrap the MTJ project. Might be a hard CQ though,
   since it seems to include cryptography.

+1 for Jetty since that's just a Piggyback CQ. They'd be
   re-using Jetty out of Orbit which is fine for me if they
   think they want to ship it in a standalone download
   without the Platform. Not sure if that's really required
   though. Hugo?

Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River

Target

Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm




-----Original Message-----
From: Raniere Hugo-wha006 [mailto:wha006@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Freitag, 04. April 2008 19:58
To: Oberhuber, Martin; DSDP PMC list; Paula Gustavo-WGP010
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] PLEASE VOTE: Contribution

Questionnaires for

MTJ Reboot

Hi Martin,

I've answered some of your questions regarding TrueZip and Antenna
Preprocessor as comments in proper CQs. Can we keep the discussion
there?

Hugo

-----Original Message-----
From: Oberhuber, Martin [mailto:Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 6:06 AM
To: DSDP PMC list; Paula Gustavo-WGP010; Raniere Hugo-wha006
Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] PLEASE VOTE: Contribution

Questionnaires for

MTJ Reboot

Hi all,

+1 for EclipseME

https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2233

   I'm very excited to get this under the Eclipse

Foundation Umbrella.

+1 for Jetty https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2235
   pending the answer if/why it needs to be packaged separately
   rather than just using what's in the Platform.
   It's not much of an issue though since this is a Piggyback CQ
   anyways so MTJ will actually use the Lib out of Orbit, right?

-1 for TrueZip for now - we also have code for transparently
   accessing TAR, TGZ, ZIP, WAR archives as part of RSE. Why not
   re-use what we already have? I commented on the CQ:
   https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2236#c8

+1 for ObjectWeb ASM 3.0
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2237
   that's just a piggyback on existing approved lib from the
   Platform (it's actually used for 3.4M6 API Tooling AFAIK)

-1 for Antenna Preprocessor for now, there are some open
   questions with respect to Provenience and unmodified or
   modified usage that I raised on the CQ and need to be answered:
   https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2243#c9


Regarding my -1's: If you just want to get started on EclipseME
Quickly I'm OK with adding TrueZip just to bootstrap and

migrate To TM


/ RSE libs later. I'd still want to understand the

differences Between


TrueZip and our offering. In fact we might eventually want To do

it

the other way round, and replace our offering with TrueZip.

For Antenna just do a little more investigations before we Blindly
approve this, thanks.

Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind

River Target

Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm




-----Original Message-----
From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of

Christian Kurzke

Sent: Freitag, 04. April 2008 00:09
To: DSDP PMC list; Paula Gustavo-WGP010; Raniere Hugo-wha006
Subject: [dsdp-pmc] PLEASE VOTE: Contribution

Questionnaires for MTJ


Reboot

Hello PMC,

As some of you may be aware, the MTJ project is undergoing some
"rebooting" at the moment.

As part of this, we are proposing to import large pieces of
"EclipseME", a project developed by Craig Setera (now a MTJ
committer).

EclipseME has several dependencies on other Open Source

libraries and

projects.
The MTJ team filed a series of Contribution Questionaires in
IP-Zilla, and is awaiting "PMC Approval".


EclipseME code:  Created by Craig Setera, EPL

https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2233


Jetty:  used as library, unmodified Apache 2.0 license

<https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2234>

https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2235


TrueZip:  used as library, unmodified Apache 2.0 license

https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2236


ASM version 3.0, pre-approved by EclipseLegal, used as
library, BSD license

https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2237


Antenna 1.0,  preprocessor library, we will need to port this
library to
support Antlr 3.0 library as per bug id=2234.  I would

still want to

vote to import version 1.0 for now.

https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2243




I ask the members of the PMC to review the CQ's, and cast a

vote, so

Doug can go ahead and communicate the outcome to the Eclipse
Legal team.

Please take a few minutes, and cast your vote by Friday,

April 11th.

Vote  +1  on all Christian



Thanks!

-Christian
_______________________________________________
dsdp-pmc mailing list
dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc


_______________________________________________
dsdp-pmc mailing list
dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc

_______________________________________________
dsdp-pmc mailing list
dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc

Back to the top