RE: [dsdp-pmc] EclipseCon 08 - votes for Embedded / Mobile Category

[Mark Rogalski <rogalski@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the data.  Certainly
looks like we're not being treated unfairly. I see a lot of unused short
talk time though. We either need to convert some of the short talk time
back to long talk (which would provide for 10 more long talks), or convert
some long talks into short talks. For that I guess we need to see if presenters
are still willing to come just for a short talk.
I also see that the Industry category
has two unused slots. I'm not sure exactly what that category means, but
if it is for non-committers who use Eclipse projects for an industry solution,
I think some of the proposed DSDP talks fit that category. For instance,
336 and 473. If we can off-load at least one of these, that would give
us another slot.

         
      Mark

"Gaff, Doug" <doug.gaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

11/26/2007 09:23 AM

Please respond to
DSDP PMC list <dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"DSDP PMC list" <dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [dsdp-pmc] EclipseCon 08 - votes for Embedded / Mobile Category

Hi Mark,
 
Yes, that’s correct. 
This was pretty consistent for the top level projects.  Bjorn is pushing
for much more short talks this year, and each top level project got a lot
of short talks.  Here are the stats.  The first number is the
number of submissions and the second is the number of allocations. 
We can fight for an additional long talk slot from the reserved pool, but
clearly there will be lots of folks asking for that.  As you can see,
everyone is massively over allocated.
 
Doug

Category	Long Talk	Short Talk	Tutorial	%
Business	19 / 5	2 / 5	0 / 0	70.0%
C/C++	6 / 2	1 / 5	1 / 3	40.0%
Data Tooling	3 / 3	1 / 5	4 / 3	63.6%
Director's Choice	1 / 2	0 / 0	0 / 0	50.0%
Emerging Technologies	19 / 5	9 / 20	8 / 3	60.7%
Industry	0 / 2	0 / 10	0 / 0	0.0%
Java	7 / 4	5 / 5	4 / 3	100.0%
Mobile and Embedded	11 / 4	10 / 10	6 / 3	100.0%
Modeling	18 / 5	19 / 10	15 / 8	100.0%
Committer and Contributor	7 / 4	8 / 5	2 / 3	91.7%
OSGi DevCon	21 / 4	11 / 10	9 / 6	100.0%
Other	10 / 2	7 / 5	6 / 0	100.0%
Eclipse as a Platform	17 / 4	8 / 10	11 / 9	91.3%
Rich Client Platform	20 / 4	19 / 10	18 / 9	100.0%
Reporting	5 / 4	5 / 5	3 / 3	100.0%
SOA	9 / 4	10 / 5	2 / 3	91.7%
Test and Performance	14 / 4	1 / 10	4 / 6	45.0%
Tools	25 / 4	6 / 10	8 / 3	76.5%
Web Tools	11 / 5	7 / 10	8 / 9	83.3%
Used vs. Allocated Slots	68 / 71	100 / 150	67 / 74	79.7%
	95.8%	66.7%	90.5%
Submissions vs. Total Slots	223 / 80	129 / 160	109 / 80	144.1%
	278.8%	80.6%	136.3%

From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Mark Rogalski
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 8:25 PM
To: DSDP PMC list
Cc: DSDP PMC list; dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [dsdp-pmc] EclipseCon 08 - votes for Embedded / Mobile
Category
 

Doug, 

Do I understand correctly that there are only 4 long talk slots available
for device/embedded topics? Considering how Eclipse has been trying to
emphasize embedded more, this seems rather restrictive. Do you have the
breakdown on what other top level projects are getting? Also, are there
any stats on the number of proposals submitted vs slots available?

                    
   Mark

"Gaff, Doug" <doug.gaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

11/21/2007 03:20 PM

Please respond to
DSDP PMC list <dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"DSDP PMC list" <dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[dsdp-pmc] EclipseCon 08 - votes for Embedded / Mobile Category

 

Hi PMC, 
  
I’ve setup voting for the Category:
  
http://wiki.eclipse.org/DSDP/PMC/EclipseCon08_Votes
  
Please add your votes here.  We may need to discuss some of these
talks further next week. 
  
Doug 
 _______________________________________________
dsdp-pmc mailing list
dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc_______________________________________________
dsdp-pmc mailing list
dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc