RE: [dsdp-pmc] Code contribution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

RE: [dsdp-pmc] Code contribution

From: "Mike Milinkovich" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:11:25 -0400
Delivered-to: dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://eclipse.org/pipermail/dsdp-pmc>
List-help: <mailto:dsdp-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc>, <mailto:dsdp-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc>, <mailto:dsdp-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
Thread-index: Acbh12U4AX5IalbzQDejOMNsn1OkRAANW3rwAACMcxAAAQdRUAAArFqwAAPeraA=

Title: Code contribution

That's the part that makes no sense to me. The license that you quoted for the binaries is a very open and flexible BSD license. If they've really put the code under that license, the source should be easily available.

Access to the source code is a prerequisite to starting the legal review.

We were not able to get source code from the other unit. At least yet.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [dsdp-pmc] Code contribution
  - From: mika.hoikkala

References:
- RE: [dsdp-pmc] Code contribution
  - From: mika.hoikkala

Prev by Date: RE: [dsdp-pmc] Code contribution
Next by Date: RE: [dsdp-pmc] Code contribution
Previous by thread: RE: [dsdp-pmc] Code contribution
Next by thread: RE: [dsdp-pmc] Code contribution
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs