[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] SR1

hi gorken,

i just updated the feature version to 1.1.1. i also generated a nightly build with all the changes.

based on helios SR1 plan, those are the dates that we need to have stable releases.
RC2 - 8/31
RC3 - 9/7
RC4 - 9/14

i will generate this weekend the stable build. then we can update the feature version in helios build

ok for everyone?
:)
gep



On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Gorkem Ercan <gercan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> The code has been changed we do need to produce RC1 build Here is a list of
> bugs that are fixed for MTJ 1.1.1.http://bit.ly/dy03X7
> --
> Gorkem
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Gustavo Eliano <gustavo.eliano@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> hi daniel (sorry i wrote marcel, because i was reading an email from
>> him before writing that one :)),
>>
>> if there were no changes on the code, i think it is a little strange
>> to rebuild it just to be complaint with good pratices... but if other
>> guys agree there is no problem for me
>>
>> :)
>> gep
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Daniel Pastore <kpqb38@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Gustavo,
>> > Even though there were no code changes, I understand that the version
>> > should
>> > be update to x.y.z+1 and it should be generated as a maintenance build
>> > (x.y.z.M<qualifier>), to comply with the good practices mentioned. :)
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 16:50, Gustavo Eliano <gustavo.eliano@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> thanks marcel!!!
>> >>
>> >> about pulsar, if the other components were changed (JDT and the
>> >> platform), pulsar itself will then be repacked. my question was more
>> >> about mtj itself. if there were no changes on mtj since helios, then
>> >> the same mtj can be used in pulsar SR1 package and it would not be
>> >> necessary to rebuild mtj.
>> >>
>> >> i really don't remember if there were significant changes since the
>> >> helios build.
>> >>
>> >> :)
>> >> gep
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Daniel Pastore <kpqb38@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Gustavo,
>> >> > I talked with Markus Knauer (from EPP), asking if we needed a new
>> >> > build
>> >> > for
>> >> > Pulsar, and he said it was a good practice to do so. :)
>> >> > Please let me know if I can help you updating Helios and EPP build
>> >> > files.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 16:37, Gustavo Eliano
>> >> > <gustavo.eliano@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> does anyone see the need to update the build in the SR1? i don't
>> >> >> remember if there were changes since 1.1 release. if ther were,
>> >> >> please
>> >> >> let me know and i can see how to work on that
>> >> >>
>> >> >> :)
>> >> >> gep
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
>> >> >> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> > Daniel Pastore
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
>> >> > dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
>> >> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Daniel Pastore
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
>> > dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
>> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Gorkem
> http://www.gorkem-ercan.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>
>