I thing for (1) the release review slides are already posted and open for comment in this location http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/mtj/reviews/MTJ_1.1_Release_Review.ppt
(2) Needs the API report URL only (the bugs are already listed) which can be generated as part of the build (12) is probably a glitch on the grid software it should be green as the required information is already provided (I can see it on the portal)
6, 7, 11 seems good candidates to work on. -- Gorkem
Another great piece of news is that Daniel Pastore is now an MTJ committer. Since we have a build now, I believe we can focus on the other train requirements.
From all of them, we can start working right away in items (1), (6), (7), (11), (12). We helped to prepare Sequoyah release review slides, so we'll work on a draft version for MTJ and then send it for you guys to review.
If there is any other point that you believe we can help, please let us know.
Tks,
Marcel
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Gorkem Ercan <gercan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Great! Please let me know if I can help.. -- Gorkem
i found this weekend the problem with the build script. the issue in happening only during the singing of the SDK component. i'm investigating the root cause and hope to have a fix as soon as possible. in the worst case we will generate a build without the SDK unti this Wednesday.
Unfortunately, I know nothing about the build scripts. If there is
anything I can do to help out with the Helios stuff, let me know. I
don't have a lot of time in the coming weeks, but I'm willing to try to
help out where I can.
On 5/10/10 9:16 AM, Gorkem Ercan wrote:
It looks like Gustavo has got to some of the build scripts
and updated them for 3.6 but not all of them. Although I am familiar
with PDE builds, I am not familiar with the MTJ build scripts before
I start fiddling with it can anyone more familiar work with me on them.
The documentation is very limited on them
--
Gorkem
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Gorkem
Ercan <gercan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I
think we now have a manageable list of requirements remaining to
satisfy for Helios. The build seems to be the major issue. The
committer approval is waiting on DSDP PMC at this time.
great advance! We (Eldorado team) were planning to help you
guys on this front (Helios requirements) this week on. While Pastore
committer status is not ready, we'll check what we can do to have all
the requirements filled and get in touch with you.
Regarding the build, for Pulsar generation we would need an
integration build by Wednesday (May 12), so we can fix possible
problems (if any). Is there something you need to get the build
working? If you want, we can provide Sequoyah build scrips, since MTJ
now has to be built against Helios, and we already did the necessary
changes in Sequoyah side (maybe you can reuse something). Not having an
integration build by next wednesday might impact the package generation
for RC1.
Please let us know if there is something else we can do.
Tks,
Marcel
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Gorkem Ercan <gercan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I have created a wiki page to document the capabilities
provided by MTJ (there are not many anyway ) Here is the page http://wiki.eclipse.org/DSDP/MTJ/MTJ_Capabilities .
I do not think it requires more information but if you feel it does
please feel free to add. Also updated the release train tracker with
the information
Also did a check for ICU4J requirements. Found a couple of
places where the new code needs to use ICU4J. Also fixed them and
updated the tracker. Committers, please do think about requirements if
you are updating code on MTJ.
I think we need to generate an API report for 1.1 stream
on the next I-build to satisfy that requirement.Can we still try to
generate an integration build?