[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] Tackling more Helios release requirements

Hi Gorkem,

great advance! We (Eldorado team) were planning to help you guys on this front (Helios requirements) this week on. While Pastore committer status is not ready, we'll check what we can do to have all the requirements filled and get in touch with you. 

Regarding the build, for Pulsar generation we would need an integration build by Wednesday (May 12), so we can fix possible problems (if any). Is there something you need to get the build working? If you want, we can provide Sequoyah build scrips, since MTJ now has to be built against Helios, and we already did the necessary changes in Sequoyah side (maybe you can reuse something). Not having an integration build by next wednesday might impact the package generation for RC1.

Please let us know if there is something else we can do.


On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Gorkem Ercan <gercan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I have created a wiki page to document the capabilities provided by MTJ (there are not many anyway ) Here is the page http://wiki.eclipse.org/DSDP/MTJ/MTJ_Capabilities . I do not think it requires more information but if you feel it does please feel free to add. Also updated the release train tracker with the information 

Also did a check for ICU4J requirements. Found a couple of places where the new code needs to use ICU4J. Also fixed them and updated the tracker. Committers, please do think about requirements if you are updating code on MTJ. 

I think we need to generate an API report for 1.1 stream on the next I-build to satisfy that requirement.Can we still try to generate an integration build? 

dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list