Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] Move Jetty dependency to the latest

[Christian Kurzke <christian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Looks like the consensus is:

Let's not introduce this new version in the 1.0.1 release.

We can re-visit this in the SR2 timeframe, where we have some bigger 
re-structures anyways. (due to TFM project dependencies)

-christian


Craig Setera wrote:
> I agree that moving from Jetty 5 to Jetty 6 is probably bigger than a 
> point release change.
>
> On 7/27/09 3:20 PM, Sandin Diego-WDS057 wrote:
> >  Hi everyone,
> >
> >  
> >
> > I was analyzing the bug #281658 
> > <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=281658> and I believe 
> > we would need to rewrite most of the code to do this upgrade. Do we 
> > really need to move to the latest version for the 1.0.1 release? 
> > Everything is working pretty well for now and updating to the newer 
> > version would only save a couple of MB of download size. I would 
> > prefer to do this in another release then 1.0.1 but would like the 
> > opinion of the community in this matter.
> >
> >  
> >
> > Do we need to fix this for the 1.0.1 service release?
> >
> >  
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Diego
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
> > dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
> >   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>