I think that
this is exactly the SDK that
they are complaining. I just found the registry keys here that your
What are the
opinions of the list members about
adding this SDK importer to MTJ? Probably we will not have resources to
but maybe there is some one on the list that is interested in the work.
note that the code uses an external library to access the registry (http://jawinproject.sourceforge.net/).
this library would also need to be contributed to MTJ or the code
to avoid using it.
It has been a *very* long time since I had a Siemens-specific set of
EclipseME. I had to go back to the EclipseME CVS archives in
to even find the code. That code uses the Windows registry to find the
devices. Somewhere along the way Siemens contacted me and had started
using UEI instead. I'm not sure if they switched back or if they
The code for this is located in the Sourceforge CVS for EclipseME at http://eclipseme.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/eclipseme/eclipseme.toolkit.siemens/?pathrev=v1_5_0
Let me know if that helps or doesn't.
Paula Gustavo-WGP010 wrote:
We had some reports on
the newsgroup of users that
wanted to a Siemens SDK. they complain that MTj cannot import it. I
that sometime ago you mention that this SDK wasn’t UEI complaint and
you have an specific importer for it on MTJ. Do you know if this is the
Here is the link to the newsgroup question. I downloaded the SDK
and to be it
doesn’t seems to be UEI.
dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list