[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] Last MTJ RC next week
- From: Dan Murphy <dgemurphy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:44:27 +0100
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=MF6cVbCd+Y5LjF8H+fmx1oJkFne/xR5DD1yiHeBGuqjTf6viyxM/9jruuZKYfFlFC4 GzFX8bSNeXbw6yLkhEezOtFMmc9Zyw/aFru12NysrbUMTkQl8dvD0Z0XbQ8SvOnlLiIM 8tl98mu0izA1KqpeochJqBZ1S/8seOkkdWg0I=
Dunno if anyone's had a chance to look at https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=273720 but it's a simple fix for a obvious failure. Also I've just submitted https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=278984 both of which, whilst arguably not mustfix's were rather high impact (ie function doesn't work or restart eclipse required).
If no-one objects I might take a look at https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=276084 since one issue that it highlights is that if you import (eg from svn/cvs) a project that is configured to use a device that doesn't exist in your workspace then not being able to edit the application descriptor and getting a NPE is a bit of a show stopper. I know that there are moves to add listeners etc to detect registry changes these won't affect the issue of opening an Application Descriptor that contains a isn't in the device registry. I'm hoping a simple fix could improve the user experience....