|RE: [dsdp-mtj-dev] Issue with device rename|
I also concur. While there are a lot of things we could add, now is not the time to be adding them. Instead, we need to collect the ideas for the next major release with Helios.
Senior Product Manager, Mobile Developer Tools & SDK
Developer Platforms and Services
Ecosystem and Market Development
809 11th Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
From: dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sandin Diego-WDS057
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:14
To: Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-mtj-dev] Issue with device rename
I agree with Dan, I’m not comfortable with the idea of introduction such a change so late in the release timeframe. We will need to be very careful to guarantee that the user workspace won’t be broken fro RC1 to RCx after this change (we’ll have to work on the migratory classes again).
From my perspective, I believe this issue is not a blocker must-fix issue as pointed by Craig; users are living with it for quite some time. I think we could document it as a Know issue and fix in a 1.1 release when enhancing the Device/SDK infrastructure.
On Behalf Of Dan
As a user, I'd prefer not
to have an editor that doesn't open in 1.0, but it's not a trivial fix and I
appreciate it's rather late to start introducing too much new code... I'm also
not sure how many people do rename the device / group in real
2009/5/26 Craig Setera <craigjunk@xxxxxxxxxx>
A couple of comments