|Re: RES: [dsdp-mtj-dev] Barebones ISDK integration|
I just committed Craig's code... Great job Craig!
Jon Dearden wrote:
Hi folks, I just want to add my agreement to Craig's changes. They look good to me. Regards, Jon Dearden -----Original Message----- From: dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Marques Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 12:40 PM To: Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list Subject: Re: RES: [dsdp-mtj-dev] Barebones ISDK integration Hello Everyone, Craig's patch looks ok to me too. I guess it is the best we can get by now :) Regards, David Marques Paula Gustavo-WGP010 wrote:Hi craig, I reviewed and for me it is ok. I will just not commit it on the RC1 today to give more time and seeifthere is feedback from other guys on the list. We can add it to MTJRC2.I will start to work on RC1 now. :) gep -----Mensagem original----- De: dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Em nome de Craig Setera Enviada em: domingo, 17 de maio de 2009 23:05 Para: Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list Assunto: [dsdp-mtj-dev] Barebones ISDK integration All, Please find attached a patch for a barebones ISDK integration with theIDevice. It is somewhat of a hack from the implementationperspective,but allows the ISDK interface to be tied into the IDevice interface aswe intend in the long run. It also allows the ISDK implementation towork correctly, if in a semi-backwards manner. Basically, from the outside looking in, things are "correct"... but the implementation isapure hack to keep the changes to an absolute minimum to keep the 1.0 risk to the minimum. I'd appreciate thoughts from those that are affected. Given the shortrunway, that feedback needs to be soon. If the patch is OK with everyone, I'm wondering if Diego or Gustavo could apply the patch? Myweek will be very busy with soccer beyond tonight and I'm not sure ifIwould have time to actually apply the patch and check it in beyond tonight. I just didn't feel comfortable committing this late in the schedules without agreement from the larger group. Thanks, Craig _______________________________________________ dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev_______________________________________________ dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev --------------------------------------------------------------------- This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. _______________________________________________ dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev