[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ 0.9 Integration Build Available
|
Just to let everyone else on the list know. I was also able to reproduce
the problem on ubuntu with eclipse 3.4
We are continuing the discussions about the problem on
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=243000
:)
gep
-----Original Message-----
From: dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Craig Setera
Sent: segunda-feira, 25 de agosto de 2008 22:06
To: Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
Subject: Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ 0.9 Integration Build Available
If you get a chance to try Ubuntu, let me know. My concern at this
point is that we will release a version of MTJ and it will rear its ugly
head.
Raniere Hugo-wha006 wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> Thank you for your updates, Today, Diego and I will take a look in the
> bugs opened by Edwin in order to prioritize them, we also look at this
> one you have opened.
>
> I'm using Eclipse 3.4 to develop and test MTJ, and I have no problems
> importing MicroEmu, however, I'm using Windows, not Ubuntu.
>
> Regarding the text messages in the debug warning, I'll be performing
> them today. And regarding the preverifier, it haven't received a
> preliminary approval from IP team yet, so I think we will only include
> its support on 1.0 version.
>
> Hugo
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Craig Setera
> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 10:14 PM
> To: Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
> Subject: Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ 0.9 Integration Build Available
>
> One more update. I decided to try to track down the microemulator
> problem. Unfortunately, I can't nail it down. Now, it won't fail at
> all for any emulator version. This leads me to believe this must be
> some sort of a race condition. I will try to find more time to look
> into it, but wanted to bring everyone up to date on what I'm seeing.
>
> I also wrote up a new bug having to do with the Java-based emulators
> and
>
> the new default preverifier.
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=245056
>
> Craig
>
> Craig Setera wrote:
>
>> Everyone,
>>
>> I apologize for being so quiet lately. Unfortunately, work has been
>> beyond hectic lately. Anyway, I wanted to take a bit of time with
>> the
>>
>
>
>> 0.9 integration build and to report back today.
>>
>> The first thing that I wanted to look at is the issue with the
>> microemulator import I was seeing. Unfortunately, it still exists.
>> The interesting part is that it appears to be *somehow* related to
>> Eclipse 3.4. When running on Eclipse 3.3, I'm not seeing the issue.
>> The issue happens for any version of microemulator. Is anyone other
>> than me testing with Eclipse 3.4? I think we need to make sure that
>> MTJ works correctly when installed into Eclipse 3.4. My current
>> theory is that this is somehow related to the "skins" support that
>> was
>>
>
>
>> introduced in MTJ. That does not exist in EclipseME and may be
>> leading to some sort of a problem. Given my lack of time in recent
>> weeks, I'm not sure if I will be able to look too deeply in this...
>> if
>>
>
>
>> anyone has a chance to try microemulator on Eclipse 3.4 on Ubuntu
>> Linux that would be helpful.
>>
>> A couple of things in terms of builds/installers. The current build
>> outputs may be related to the way I was doing things in EclipseME,
>> but
>>
>
>
>> I don't think it is consistent with what is normally available for
>> download from the official Eclipse sites. I saw two things that we
>> should fix:
>>
>> 1) The SDK download should not require the runtime download... it
>> should be included. It took me a few attempts to reconcile what was
>> going on since most other Eclipse downloads have the SDK download
>> including the runtime.
>>
>> 2) The downloads should be simple unzippable zip files rooted at
>> "eclipse" Especially given the new "dropins" P2 support in Eclipse
>> 3.4, it is important that the download can be easily unzipped into
>> the
>>
>
>
>> dropins and ready to run.
>>
>> Good work on the debug warning. It is now working the way that I
>> would expect it to work. I'd like to suggest some more minor wording
>> changes to what I'm currently seeing. The changes are surrounded by
>> asterisks... the asterisks would not be included in the text. Also,
>> I
>>
>
>
>> think the options should be surrounded in quotes to separate them
>> from
>>
>
>
>> the rest of the sentence.
>>
>> ----- Text Changes ----------
>> There are some problems with your Java Debug settings for MTJ debug.
>> Do you want to fix *them*?
>> The "Suspend execution on uncaught exceptions" option must not be
>> checked on *the* Java Debug preference page.
>> The "Suspend execution on compilation errors" option must not be
>> checked on *the* Java Debug preference page.
>> The "Debugger timeout (ms)" must be set equal or greater than 15,000
>> on *the* Java Debug preference page.
>> ----- Text Changes ----------
>>
>> That's my latest run through things. I did get a response from the
>> equinox group regarding use of libraries in hook libraries for use in
>> the preprocessing support. I will see if I can make any sense of
>> that. At this point, my assumption is that the first release will be
>> going out without that support?
>> Thanks,
>> Craig
>>
>> Sandin Diego-WDS057 wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am glad to inform that the first MTJ 0.9 Integration Build is
>>> available. It can be downloaded at
>>>
>>>
> http://download1.eclipse.org/dsdp/mtj/downloads/drops/I-I20080813-2008
> 08
> 131706/index.html
>
>>> or using the
>>> http://download1.eclipse.org/dsdp/mtj/updates/0.9/Integration/
>>> update
>>>
>
>
>>> site URL.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We can now start executing the first cycle of testing available at
>>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/DSDP/MTJ/Tests .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards
>>>
>>> Diego Madruga Sandin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
>>> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
>> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>
_______________________________________________
dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
