[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ 0.9 Integration Build Available
|
Hi mtj,
Sorry for disappearing on the last two weeks... I was really busy with
other tasks at work.
I'm working today to catch up everything that happened in the past weeks
and probably i will send a lot of emails (sorry for that). I will try to
break on different subjects to make it easy to follow up each one
separately.
:)
gep
-----Original Message-----
From: dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Raniere
Hugo-wha006
Sent: segunda-feira, 25 de agosto de 2008 09:55
To: Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
Subject: RE: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ 0.9 Integration Build Available
Hi Craig,
Thank you for your updates, Today, Diego and I will take a look in the
bugs opened by Edwin in order to prioritize them, we also look at this
one you have opened.
I'm using Eclipse 3.4 to develop and test MTJ, and I have no problems
importing MicroEmu, however, I'm using Windows, not Ubuntu.
Regarding the text messages in the debug warning, I'll be performing
them today. And regarding the preverifier, it haven't received a
preliminary approval from IP team yet, so I think we will only include
its support on 1.0 version.
Hugo
-----Original Message-----
From: dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Craig Setera
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 10:14 PM
To: Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
Subject: Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ 0.9 Integration Build Available
One more update. I decided to try to track down the microemulator
problem. Unfortunately, I can't nail it down. Now, it won't fail at
all for any emulator version. This leads me to believe this must be
some sort of a race condition. I will try to find more time to look
into it, but wanted to bring everyone up to date on what I'm seeing.
I also wrote up a new bug having to do with the Java-based emulators and
the new default preverifier.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=245056
Craig
Craig Setera wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> I apologize for being so quiet lately. Unfortunately, work has been
> beyond hectic lately. Anyway, I wanted to take a bit of time with the
> 0.9 integration build and to report back today.
>
> The first thing that I wanted to look at is the issue with the
> microemulator import I was seeing. Unfortunately, it still exists.
> The interesting part is that it appears to be *somehow* related to
> Eclipse 3.4. When running on Eclipse 3.3, I'm not seeing the issue.
> The issue happens for any version of microemulator. Is anyone other
> than me testing with Eclipse 3.4? I think we need to make sure that
> MTJ works correctly when installed into Eclipse 3.4. My current
> theory is that this is somehow related to the "skins" support that was
> introduced in MTJ. That does not exist in EclipseME and may be
> leading to some sort of a problem. Given my lack of time in recent
> weeks, I'm not sure if I will be able to look too deeply in this... if
> anyone has a chance to try microemulator on Eclipse 3.4 on Ubuntu
> Linux that would be helpful.
>
> A couple of things in terms of builds/installers. The current build
> outputs may be related to the way I was doing things in EclipseME, but
> I don't think it is consistent with what is normally available for
> download from the official Eclipse sites. I saw two things that we
> should fix:
>
> 1) The SDK download should not require the runtime download... it
> should be included. It took me a few attempts to reconcile what was
> going on since most other Eclipse downloads have the SDK download
> including the runtime.
>
> 2) The downloads should be simple unzippable zip files rooted at
> "eclipse" Especially given the new "dropins" P2 support in Eclipse
> 3.4, it is important that the download can be easily unzipped into the
> dropins and ready to run.
>
> Good work on the debug warning. It is now working the way that I
> would expect it to work. I'd like to suggest some more minor wording
> changes to what I'm currently seeing. The changes are surrounded by
> asterisks... the asterisks would not be included in the text. Also, I
> think the options should be surrounded in quotes to separate them from
> the rest of the sentence.
>
> ----- Text Changes ----------
> There are some problems with your Java Debug settings for MTJ debug.
> Do you want to fix *them*?
> The "Suspend execution on uncaught exceptions" option must not be
> checked on *the* Java Debug preference page.
> The "Suspend execution on compilation errors" option must not be
> checked on *the* Java Debug preference page.
> The "Debugger timeout (ms)" must be set equal or greater than 15,000
> on *the* Java Debug preference page.
> ----- Text Changes ----------
>
> That's my latest run through things. I did get a response from the
> equinox group regarding use of libraries in hook libraries for use in
> the preprocessing support. I will see if I can make any sense of
> that. At this point, my assumption is that the first release will be
> going out without that support?
> Thanks,
> Craig
>
> Sandin Diego-WDS057 wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am glad to inform that the first MTJ 0.9 Integration Build is
>> available. It can be downloaded at
>>
http://download1.eclipse.org/dsdp/mtj/downloads/drops/I-I20080813-200808
131706/index.html
>> or using the
>> http://download1.eclipse.org/dsdp/mtj/updates/0.9/Integration/ update
>> site URL.
>>
>>
>>
>> We can now start executing the first cycle of testing available at
>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/DSDP/MTJ/Tests .
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Diego Madruga Sandin
>>
>>
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
>> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
_______________________________________________
dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
_______________________________________________
dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
