Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] Next MTJ Call: 21/July/2008 - meeting minutes

[Craig Setera <craigjunk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I have sent an email on this topic to see if we can get any ideas.

Raniere Hugo-wha006 wrote:
> Hi Craig, 
>
> By now we are trying to have antenna preprocessor approved to use by IP
> team (https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2444). Omry has
> already commited to contribute this code and I think we will be OK with
> this CQ, if not for this release, for the next one.
>
> The missing thing is the hooks stuff which I did not have time to
> understand at all. As you have more knowledge about the problem, it
> would be great with you start the discussions with OSGi guys. Please,
> include us in the loop so we can keep it if you run out of time.
>
> Hugo
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Craig Setera
> Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 8:03 PM
> To: Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
> Subject: Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] Next MTJ Call: 21/July/2008 - meeting
> minutes
>
> Eric,
>
> I understand your thinking on this... but I still have some concerns 
> about how this is going to work out.  My ultimate goal is to retire 
> EclipseME when MTJ is ready to replace it.  For those that are using the
>
> preprocessor support, MTJ will not be ready... which stretches the 
> lifetime of EclipseME and therefore my necessary commitment to that 
> project.  Time spent on EclipseME is time not spent on MTJ... And given 
> how little time I'm finding these days that could be significant.
>
> I think splitting out the preprocessor is something we should seriously 
> consider.  The other alternative is to find a way to get this through 
> legal approval...
>
> Did anyone ever talk to the OSGi guys about the ability to use a jar 
> file in those hooks?  Is that something that I should ask them about?
>
> Thanks,
> Craig
>
> Hildum Eric-XFQ473 wrote:
>   
> > I would rather not split this out and have a hybrid project. On the 
> > other hand, I do not want to delay things any further than absolutely 
> > necessary. My feeling is we should keep the preprocessor inside MTJ, 
> > but do the next release(s) with our current capability (that is, 
> > without preprocessor).
> >  
> >  
> > Eric Hildum
> > Senior Product Manager, Mobile Developer Tools & SDK
> > Software Platforms and Delivery
> > Ecosystem and Market Development
> > Motorola
> > Direct: +1-408-541-6809
> > Mobile: +1-510-305-0801
> >  
> > 809 11th Avenue
> > Sunnyvale, CA 94089
> > USA
> >  
> >
> >
> >     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   
> > *From:* dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Craig Setera
> > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 22, 2008 14:12
> > *To:* Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
> > *Subject:* Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] Next MTJ Call: 21/July/2008 - meeting 
> > minutes
> >
> > I was thinking about the preprocessor issues.  I'd hate to lose that 
> > support, but I'd also hate to have it hold up the release.  I'm 
> > wondering if we should also consider an option where we split that 
> > functionality out of the base plugins and I host it outside of 
> > Eclipse?  It would take some work, but it might be the best of both 
> > worlds for those that still want that functionality on top of MTJ.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > On Jul 21, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Paula Gustavo-WGP010 wrote:
> >
> >     
> > > the wiki is updated with the meeting minutes (thanks to christian 
> > > that took note of everything)
> > > http://wiki.eclipse.org/DSDP/MTJ/Phone_Meeting_21-July-2008
> > >  
> > > feel free to add or send comments
> > >  
> > > :)
> > > gep
> > >  
> > >  
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
> > > dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
> > >       
> >     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   
> > _______________________________________________
> > dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
> > dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
> >   
> >     
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>