Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ Working Plan

Hello everyone.  From our perspective, this would be an essential
feature in order for developers wishing to target our platform to use
MTJ.  Our platform supports MIDP and CLDC, but there is a lot more there
as well; having some way to plug that stuff into the tool would be good.

Thanks for listening. ;)

Ken Wallis

Team Lead - Java Development Platform Tools
Research In Motion
905-629-4746 x4369

-----Original Message-----
From: dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Craig Setera
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 8:30 PM
To: Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
Subject: Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ Working Plan

Gustavo,

One thing I think we have failed to consider in our prior discussions is

pulling the current MTJ functionality for configurations and profiles
outside of CLDC and MIDP.  Depending on input from other groups, I'm not

sure when that should happen, but I do believe we should be pulling that

functionality into the MTJ plan somewhere in the future.

Craig

Paula Gustavo-WGP010 wrote:
> Hi MTJers,
>
> Since the end of last year we have been evaluating possible directions
> to go forward with MTJ. One direction that initially seemed to be
> unlikely now appears to be the most technically feasible way to go
> forward. We would like to share it with you and hear your feedback.
>
> The proposed direction is to use the latest EclipseME (1.7.7 or newer)
> as the code base for the MTJ "reboot". There are a couple of
advantages
> of this approach that are listed below:
> - Eclipse is about communities and EclipseME already has a very large
> user community. This means it has been tested by a large number of
users
> and we thought that it would be easier to create a developer community
> around it;
> - All major device manufactures today use or point to EclipseME as a
> possible JavaME development environment. With current MTJ code base,
we
> might not be able in a short or medium term to provide a viable
> alternative to EclipseME, and we expect most commercial users, will
> continue to use EclipseME (including Motorola). There is no big user
nor
> developer community around the current MTJ codebase, and it will be
> really hard to create one if everyone is still using EclipseME
> - Craig Setera will be one of the MTJ committers; the benefits are
that
> he understands deeply the code, and he also has a lot of
> experience/feedback from "real users" about desired future features.
> This very greatly reduces the risk of developing a MTJ 1.0. The goal
is
> to provide a unified community/codebase for EclipseME and MTJ in the
> future.
>
> We propose the following steps in order to achieve this goal. We can
> break those steps according to some main milestones later:
> - MTJ 0.8 (EclipseME 1.7.7 refactored)
> 	- Refactor all EclipseME code to follow eclipse code standards
> 	- Refactor all EclipseME documentation
> 	- Eclipse Foundation Intellectual Property review on new code
> contribution
> 	- Commit code to Eclipse foundation Subversion / CVS
> - MTJ 0.9 (Increase flexibility)
> 	- Refactor code to break dependencies between UI and Core
> 	- Define a plugin model to support more flexibility. Focus on:
> 	- Pre-verify
> 	- Signing
> 	- Packaging
> 	- Deploying
> 	- Device Manager
> 	- Obfuscation
> 	- Preprocessing
> 	- Include an API layer between UI and Core (possibly with code
> from current MTJ 0.7)
> 	- Define Extension Points to implement the API layer
> - MTJ 1.0 (add back features from MTJ 0.7)
> 	- Refactor and move code from MTJ 0.7 to new code line
> 	- Signing solution
> 	- Import other JavaIDE projects (Netbeans, CarbideJ,
> MotodevStudio)
> 	- MIDlets templates
>
> MTJ 1.0 will have all features that we plan to include on MTJ first
> release. Items like a "GUI Builder" for Midlets are currently out of
the
> MTJ 1.0 scope - unless new developers want to join the project and
help
> with the implementation.
>
> Thanks,
> gustavo
>
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>
_______________________________________________
dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.


Back to the top