RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] Is there any need for a multi-Container MIimplementati

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] Is there any need for a multi-Container MIimplementation?

From: Frederic RISS <frederic.riss@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:35:51 +0100
Delivered-to: dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/dsdp-dd-dev>
List-help: <mailto:dsdp-dd-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev>, <mailto:dsdp-dd-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-dd-dev>, <mailto:dsdp-dd-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Le jeudi 20 mars 2008 à 14:20 -0400, Marc Khouzam a écrit :
> I was thinking that for tracking, it would be easier (as you mention)
> to use a bug.  I opened bug 223386 (because I couldn't find an existing one.)
> 
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=223386
> 
> It would be very nice if you could attach your patches to that bug.

I've attached 2 patches there for discussion

Cheers,
Fred

References:
- RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] Is there any need for a multi-Container MIimplementation?
  - From: Marc Khouzam

Prev by Date: RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] Is there any need for a multi-Container MIimplementation?
Next by Date: [dsdp-dd-dev] DSF (unhandled exception error)
Previous by thread: RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] Is there any need for a multi-Container MIimplementation?
Next by thread: Re: [dsdp-dd-dev] Is there any need for a multi-Container MI implementation?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs